This resource explains the end-to-end process of how AI systems translate natural-language questions into executable SQL, compares rule-based and LLM-driven approaches, and guides you through practical, hands-on exercises inside Galaxy’s context-aware editor.
Ever typed a question like “Show me the top 10 customers by revenue last quarter” and watched an AI assistant churn out a SELECT
statement? Behind that seemingly magical moment is a layered pipeline of intent detection, schema grounding, and query generation. In this guide you will learn how AI produces SQL you can trust, practice the workflow yourself, and discover how Galaxy’s AI copilot raises the accuracy bar by weaving your data context directly into the generation loop.
The first step is transforming prose into structured pieces the model can reason about:
User Prompt: "List active users who upgraded in June."
8 Intent: RETRIEVE
8 Entities: {table: users, status: 'active', event: 'upgrade', month: '2023-06'}
Classical NLP pipelines use tokenisation and part-of-speech tagging; LLMs implicitly learn these patterns during pre-training.
AI must map concepts like “active users” to concrete columns in your database (users.last_active_at
). Without grounding, an LLM might hallucinate fields that do not exist.
Once entities align with the schema, the model assembles clauses (SELECT
, FROM
, WHERE
, GROUP BY
, ORDER BY
). Some systems build an abstract syntax tree (AST) first, others generate raw SQL tokens directly.
Early “AI” solutions relied on manually curated templates:
Template: "SELECT {{columns}} FROM {{table}} WHERE {{condition}}"
Pros: fast and predictable. Cons: brittle—new question types require new templates.
Neural nets treat SQL as another language to translate into. Sequence-to-sequence (seq2seq) models with attention outperform templates but still struggle with unseen schemas.
Models like GPT-4 or open-source Llama 3 have ingested vast code corpora. When prompt-engineered with your schema and examples, they can generate complex joins and window functions in one shot.
We will convert the question “Which five products generated the highest revenue in Q1 2024?” into SQL.
// Galaxy automatically fetches
Tables: orders (id, product_id, total_price, created_at)
products (id, name, category)
Intent: aggregation (TOP N)
Entities: product, revenue, Q1 2024 (date range)
SELECT p.name,
SUM(o.total_price) AS revenue
FROM orders o
JOIN products p ON p.id = o.product_id
WHERE o.created_at BETWEEN '2024-01-01' AND '2024-03-31'
GROUP BY p.name
ORDER BY revenue DESC
LIMIT 5;
EXPLAIN
mode.// Copilot prompt: "Rewrite using CTEs & include product category"
WITH q1_orders AS (
SELECT product_id,
total_price
FROM orders
WHERE created_at BETWEEN '2024-01-01' AND '2024-03-31'
)
SELECT p.category,
p.name,
SUM(q.total_price) AS revenue
FROM q1_orders q
JOIN products p ON p.id = q.product_id
GROUP BY p.category, p.name
ORDER BY revenue DESC
LIMIT 5;
Cmd + J
shortcut) with: "Find daily sign-ups and 7-day rolling average for the last month."
Watch the Copilot fetch your users
table schema, propose a window-function query, and insert it into the editor.Cmd + Enter
. Results appear in the grid. Toggle the Chart tab for a quick line graph.EXPLAIN
, indexes, and Copilot prompts like “optimize for Postgres”.SELECT
clause only first, then add filters. Easier to debug.WITH
CTEs.