Features
A metric is a quantitative measurement; a KPI is a metric explicitly chosen to track progress toward a critical business goal.
Metrics measure anything; KPIs measure what matters. All KPIs are metrics, but only a hand-picked subset of metrics become KPIs because they map directly to strategic objectives and have clear targets and timeframes.
Healthy data-driven organizations collect many metrics—query latency, daily active users, gross margin, number of coffee pods left in the kitchen. But only a small fraction of those measurements drive key decisions and resource allocation. Mixing up the two concepts leads to bloated dashboards, unfocused teams, and poorly scoped data pipelines. Sharpening the line between KPIs (key performance indicators) and ordinary metrics keeps engineering, product, and leadership aligned on what must improve versus what is merely interesting.
A metric is any quantitative value that can be monitored over time. It can be raw (e.g., row count in a table) or derived (e.g., average order value). Engineers care about system metrics such as CPU utilization and query runtime; analysts care about business metrics like customer churn or net revenue. A good metric is well-defined, consistent, and calculable.
A KPI is a metric that:
Thus, every KPI is a metric, but the reverse is not true. If a metric lacks strategic linkage or deadlines, it stays a metric.
Notice how the KPI wording bakes in targets and timelines, whereas plain metrics do not.
It is tempting to elevate whatever metric is easiest to calculate. Resist. Start with the business objective, then explore which metric best represents progress. If the ideal metric is hard to compute, invest in the data pipeline rather than compromise the KPI.
A common rule of thumb is no more than 3–5 KPIs per team. Beyond that, focus and accountability crumble.
A good KPI guides clear interventions. If a KPI slips, teams know which levers—price, feature adoption, marketing channels—they can pull.
Lagging KPIs (e.g., quarterly revenue) confirm results; leading KPIs (e.g., weekly product-qualified leads) predict them. A healthy mix fosters proactive course-correction.
Suppose an e-commerce startup wants to boost gross merchandise value (GMV) by 25% this year. They pick “Monthly GMV” as a KPI and set a target.
-- Calculate monthly GMV (a KPI) for the current year
SELECT date_trunc('month', order_date) AS month,
SUM(order_total) AS gmv
FROM analytics.orders
WHERE order_date >= date_trunc('year', current_date)
GROUP BY 1
ORDER BY 1;
Other interesting figures—average basket size, refund rate—remain metrics until leadership decides they warrant KPI status.
Because KPIs are ultimately SQL queries materialized on a dashboard, a fast, developer-friendly SQL editor like Galaxy streamlines KPI definition and maintenance:
Why it happens: Dashboards are easy to create; strategic focus is hard.
Fix: Run a quarterly review to demote metrics that no longer align with goals.
Why it’s wrong: Moving targets sabotage trend analysis and team morale.
Fix: Freeze KPI formulas for the duration of the reporting period; schedule schema migrations in off-cycles.
Why it’s wrong: Impossible goals lead to apathy or data-skewing behaviors.
Fix: Use historical benchmarks and capacity planning to set achievable stretch goals.
A North-Star KPI encapsulates the ultimate value your product delivers (e.g., weekly retained users). Supporting KPIs break it down into components—activation rate, referral rate—allowing more granular ownership.
Sometimes a single number alone is misleading. Composite KPIs (e.g., Net Promoter Score which merges promoters and detractors) balance multiple inputs. Ensure each sub-metric is still measurable on its own for diagnostics.
Think of your data warehouse as a library of metrics. Your executive dashboard curates only the KPIs—the few chosen books everyone must read. A rigorous KPI selection process, backed by reliable metric definitions, is the backbone of data-informed decision-making.
Mastering the difference between KPIs and metrics transforms raw data into focused action, ensuring that engineering effort and business strategy move in lockstep.
Without a clear distinction, teams drown in data, chase vanity numbers, and misallocate engineering resources. Defining true KPIs focuses effort on the few measurements that directly impact strategic objectives and revenue.
It must map to a strategic goal, have a time-bound target, an accountable owner, and trigger action when off-track. Without these elements, it remains a regular metric.
Yes, but only at predefined review intervals (e.g., quarterly). Changing KPIs mid-cycle undermines consistency and comparability.
Typically 3–5 per team. More than that dilutes focus and hampers decision-making.
Absolutely. Galaxy’s AI Copilot speeds up writing KPI SQL, while Collections let teams endorse and share authoritative KPI queries without leaving the editor.
.avif){kind=logo}
