Key metrics for a data observability program are quantifiable indicators—such as freshness, completeness, volume, distribution, schema change rate, and lineage coverage—that measure the health, reliability, and trustworthiness of data pipelines and assets.
Healthy pipelines start with measurable signals.
A robust data observability program relies on a small set of well-defined metrics—freshness, completeness, volume, distribution, schema change rate, lineage coverage, and incident response—to expose issues before they reach your dashboards or customers.
Data observability is the practice of monitoring, tracking, and troubleshooting the health of data as it moves from source systems through pipelines to downstream consumers. Just as DevOps teams instrument applications with logs, metrics, and traces, data teams instrument datasets, pipelines, and warehouses to detect anomalies early and maintain trust.
Without clearly defined metrics, data teams are left guessing whether a pipeline is really healthy. Metrics convert gut feelings into hard numbers, enabling:
Measures how up-to-date data is compared to its expected arrival time. Freshness lag is usually expressed in minutes or hours.
actual_load_time - expected_load_time
Indicates whether all expected records arrived. This can be row counts, distinct keys, or % of nulls in mandatory columns.
actual_count / expected_count
Absolute row count or data size (GB) per batch or partition. Spikes or drops often signal upstream issues.
Checks whether column values fall within historical ranges: mean, median, min/max, or histogram buckets. Useful for catching silent data drifts.
Frequency of column additions, deletions, or type changes. Sudden changes can break downstream joins or BI dashboards.
Percentage of critical tables and columns with end-to-end lineage captured. Higher coverage increases confidence when tracing incidents.
These meta-metrics quantify the effectiveness of your observability program itself.
The following query calculates lag for each table partitioned by load_date
:
WITH expected AS (
SELECT table_name,
MAX(expected_load_time) AS expected_ts
FROM load_schedule
GROUP BY 1
),
actual AS (
SELECT table_name,
MAX(loaded_at) AS actual_ts
FROM warehouse_audit
GROUP BY 1
)
SELECT a.table_name,
TIMESTAMPDIFF('minute', e.expected_ts, a.actual_ts) AS freshness_lag_min
FROM actual a
JOIN expected e USING (table_name);
Run this query hourly in Galaxy’s SQL editor, save it to a Data Quality Collection, and configure alerting when freshness_lag_min > 60
.
Galaxy’s desktop SQL editor makes defining, testing, and sharing observability queries frictionless:
Defining and tracking key metrics transforms data observability from vague intuition into measurable reliability engineering. Clear metrics allow teams to set SLAs, automate alerts, and quantify trust in analytics and AI products. Without them, pipeline issues remain invisible until customers notice, damaging credibility and slowing decision-making.
Start with 3–4 (freshness, completeness, volume, distribution) on your top 20% most critical tables. Expand only when those are stable.
Yes. Freshness lag, row counts, and distribution stats like AVG
and STDDEV
are SQL-native. Tools such as Galaxy streamline scheduling and sharing of those queries.
Galaxy’s IDE lets you write, save, and endorse observability queries. The AI Copilot suggests tests, while Collections centralize them so the whole team can monitor data health consistently.
High-performing teams aim for detection within one pipeline cycle (e.g., < 1 hour for hourly jobs). Measure today’s baseline and iterate.