Query tuning in PostgreSQL means reading execution plans, adding the right indexes, and adjusting planner settings so statements return the same results faster and with less I/O.
High execution time usually comes from sequential scans on large tables, inefficient joins, or excessive data transfer. Run EXPLAIN ANALYZE
to reveal where the planner spends time. Look for "Seq Scan", high "Rows Removed", or a join node that loops millions of times—these are prime optimization targets.
Prefix the statement with EXPLAIN (ANALYZE, VERBOSE, BUFFERS)
.ANALYZE executes the query, VERBOSE shows column types, and BUFFERS reports I/O. Keep the plan output; every tuning decision should be backed by a measurable improvement in total time and shared/local read hits.
Create B-tree indexes on columns used in equality and range predicates. Composite indexes should mirror the most selective columns first, e.g., CREATE INDEX idx_orders_customer_date ON Orders(customer_id, order_date);
.Use partial indexes like WHERE order_date >= CURRENT_DATE - INTERVAL '90 days'
for hot data.
Replace SELECT *
with explicit columns, push filters as early as possible, and break complex CTEs into inline sub-queries when they don’t need materialization. Remove unnecessary ORDER BY
or DISTINCT
clauses; they add expensive sort or hash steps.
Increase work_mem
to let sorts and hashes stay in memory.Lower random_page_cost
on fast SSDs to make index plans cheaper. Test with SET
at session level before changing the postgresql.conf file so production risk is minimal.
Enable the pg_stat_statements
extension to collect per-query statistics. Combine it with auto_explain
to log any statement exceeding a threshold, e.g., SET auto_explain.log_min_duration = '500ms';
.Review logs daily and tune the worst offenders first.
Regularly ANALYZE tables, keep indexes smaller than active memory, avoid functions on indexed columns in WHERE clauses, and archive old rows into history tables. Benchmark every schema change with a representative data set before shipping to production.
.
No. Setting it too high can exhaust RAM when many connections sort in parallel. Start small (64-128MB) and monitor total memory usage.
Not on small tables or when the query needs most rows. The planner may correctly prefer a sequential scan over many random index reads.
Let autovacuum handle it, but schedule manual ANALYZE after bulk loads or deletes so statistics stay accurate.