Normalization splits wide, redundant tables into smaller, related ones so each fact is stored once, preventing anomalies and saving space.
Normalization restructures tables so that each fact lives in exactly one place, eliminating redundancy, update anomalies, and inconsistent data. In practice you split wide, repeated-field tables into smaller ones linked by primary and foreign keys and aim for third normal form (3NF).
Normalize before production if you design a fresh schema or during migrations when you notice duplicate customer or product details spread across many rows. Normalization improves storage, speeds updates, and prevents mismatched totals during financial reporting.
Use SELECT DISTINCT or GROUP BY to pull unique customers, products, or dates into dedicated tables, then reference them with foreign keys. This step is the bridge between a denormalized import and a clean relational model.
CREATE TABLE Customers (
id INT AUTO_INCREMENT PRIMARY KEY,
name VARCHAR(100),
email VARCHAR(255) UNIQUE,
created_at DATETIME DEFAULT NOW()
);
INSERT INTO Customers (name, email, created_at)
SELECT DISTINCT customer_name, customer_email, MIN(order_date)
FROM Orders_raw;
Add foreign keys and indexes to preserve referential integrity and maintain query speed. Always update application queries to use the new surrogate keys rather than the old text columns.
CREATE TABLE Orders (
id INT AUTO_INCREMENT PRIMARY KEY,
customer_id INT NOT NULL,
order_date DATE,
total_amount DECIMAL(10,2),
CONSTRAINT fk_orders_customer
FOREIGN KEY (customer_id) REFERENCES Customers(id)
);
1) Create new normalized tables. 2) Back up existing data. 3) Migrate data with INSERT…SELECT inside a transaction. 4) Add triggers or views to keep old and new structures in sync during cut-over. 5) Switch applications to the new tables. 6) Drop legacy tables once validated.
Yes. Create new tables, migrate data inside a transaction, and use triggers or views so old queries keep working until you cut traffic to the new schema.
Proper indexing keeps joins fast. The smaller row size often outweighs the extra join cost, especially on SSD-backed servers.
Most transactional tables should. For read-heavy analytics, selective denormalization or materialized views may perform better.