How to Decide on ClickHouse over SQL Server in PostgreSQL

Galaxy Glossary

When should I use ClickHouse instead of SQL Server?

Shows when and why to select ClickHouse instead of Microsoft SQL Server for analytics workloads.

Welcome to the Galaxy, Guardian!

Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Description

Example H2

Example H3

Why consider ClickHouse instead of SQL Server?

Choose ClickHouse when you need sub-second aggregation over billions of rows, low-cost horizontal scaling, and compressed columnar storage. SQL Server excels at OLTP but struggles to deliver the same price-performance for heavy analytics.

Does ClickHouse improve real-time dashboard speed?

Yes. ClickHouse’s vectorized engine, data skipping indexes, and storage-aware JOINs return metrics in milliseconds. SQL Server often needs costly indexes or in-memory options to match this speed.

How do schemas differ?

ClickHouse favors wide, denormalized tables and MergeTree engines for append-only workloads. SQL Server typically relies on normalized schemas plus columnstore indexes for analytics.

What is the basic ClickHouse query syntax?

Syntax mirrors ANSI SQL but adds functions like SAMPLE, ARRAY JOIN, and UNIQUE. See the full syntax below.

Can I keep SQL Server for transactions?

Yes. Use Change Data Capture (CDC) to stream inserts from SQL Server into ClickHouse, keeping analytics separate without disrupting OLTP.

Best practice: partition intelligently

Partition ClickHouse tables by day or month on order_date to prune I/O. In SQL Server, use partitioned columnstore tables if you must stay.

Best practice: compress strings

Enable ClickHouse codecs like ZSTD for varchar columns. SQL Server’s page compression is slower and less effective for string-heavy logs.

What are common migration steps?

1) Export schema; 2) Flatten joins; 3) Create MergeTree tables; 4) Backfill via INSERT SELECT; 5) Validate counts; 6) Cut dashboards over.

What does cost look like?

ClickHouse nodes run on commodity VM disks. SQL Server Enterprise licenses plus columnstore add-ons raise TCO quickly for large data sets.

Why How to Decide on ClickHouse over SQL Server in PostgreSQL is important

How to Decide on ClickHouse over SQL Server in PostgreSQL Example Usage


-- Find top 5 products by revenue last 30 days in ClickHouse
SELECT p.id, p.name,
       sum(oi.quantity * p.price) AS revenue
FROM   OrderItems oi
JOIN   Products   p ON p.id = oi.product_id
JOIN   Orders     o ON o.id = oi.order_id
WHERE  o.order_date >= today() - 30
GROUP  BY p.id, p.name
ORDER  BY revenue DESC
LIMIT 5;

How to Decide on ClickHouse over SQL Server in PostgreSQL Syntax


-- ClickHouse analytic query
SELECT customer_id,
       sum(total_amount) AS lifetime_value,
       count() AS order_cnt
FROM Orders
GROUP BY customer_id
ORDER BY lifetime_value DESC
LIMIT 10;

-- SQL Server equivalent (may need columnstore index)
SELECT TOP 10 customer_id,
       SUM(total_amount)  AS lifetime_value,
       COUNT(*)           AS order_cnt
FROM   Orders
GROUP  BY customer_id
ORDER BY lifetime_value DESC;

Common Mistakes

Assuming ClickHouse replaces OLTP: ClickHouse lacks ACID row-level updates. Keep SQL Server for transactions and stream data into ClickHouse for analytics.
Ignoring engine selection: Using default MergeTree without ORDER BY leads to slow reads. Always define ORDER BY (e.g., order_date, customer_id) to enable data skipping.