How to Choose Redshift over ParadeDB in PostgreSQL

When should I use Amazon Redshift instead of ParadeDB for PostgreSQL analytics?

Redshift outperforms ParadeDB for high-concurrency, petabyte-scale analytics where columnar storage, MPP, and managed infrastructure are critical.

Welcome to the Galaxy, Guardian!
You'll be receiving a confirmation email

Follow us on twitter :)

Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Description

Example H2

Example H3

Why would I pick Redshift instead of ParadeDB?

Pick Redshift when you need petabyte-scale storage, hundreds of concurrent users, and fully managed infrastructure. Redshift’s columnar storage, massively parallel processing (MPP), and automatic replication remove operational overhead that ParadeDB still requires you to manage.

What performance gains does Redshift offer?

Redshift distributes tables across nodes and stores data in compressed columnar blocks. Sequential scans become parallel block reads, slashing query times on wide fact tables such as Orders or OrderItems. ParadeDB keeps row-oriented storage, so large aggregations stay I/O bound.

How does Redshift simplify maintenance?

Redshift handles backups, vacuuming, and scaling automatically. ParadeDB forces manual VACUUM and index tuning. For lean teams, the saved ops hours alone justify Redshift’s higher price.

Can Redshift integrate with PostgreSQL tools?

Yes. Redshift uses a PostgreSQL-compatible driver, so Galaxy, psql, and DataGrip all connect natively. Your existing SQL, stored in Galaxy Collections, will run with minor syntax tweaks.

Does ParadeDB ever win?

Choose ParadeDB when you need full PostgreSQL extension support, low-latency OLTP, or tight budget control. For heavy analytics, Redshift usually wins on speed-per-dollar.

Example migration workflow

1) Export data from PostgreSQL.
2) Upload to S3.
3) COPY into Redshift.
4) Repoint Galaxy connections.
This lifts analytics loads off your primary database.

Best practices for Redshift

Create sort keys on timestamp columns (order_date) and distribution keys on high-cardinality IDs (customer_id). Keep COPY files in 1–4 GB chunks to maximize parallelism. Schedule VACUUM and ANALYZE via Redshift’s maintenance window.

Why How to Choose Redshift over ParadeDB in PostgreSQL is important

How to Choose Redshift over ParadeDB in PostgreSQL Example Usage


-- Monthly revenue by product category in Redshift
SELECT DATE_TRUNC('month', o.order_date)   AS month,
       p.category                          AS category,
       SUM(oi.quantity * p.price)          AS revenue
FROM   Orders o
JOIN   OrderItems oi ON oi.order_id = o.id
JOIN   Products p    ON p.id = oi.product_id
GROUP  BY 1,2
ORDER  BY 1,2;

How to Choose Redshift over ParadeDB in PostgreSQL Syntax


-- Load ecommerce orders into Redshift
COPY Orders
FROM 's3://acme-data/orders_*.csv'
CREDENTIALS 'aws_iam_role=arn:aws:iam::123456789012:role/RedshiftCopyRole'
DELIMITER ','
DATEFORMAT 'auto'
TIMEFORMAT 'auto'
IGNOREHEADER 1
COMPUPDATE ON
STATUPDATE ON;

-- Create distribution and sort keys
after loading
CREATE TABLE Orders_dist (
    id INT,
    customer_id INT,
    order_date DATE,
    total_amount NUMERIC(12,2)
)
DISTKEY(customer_id)
SORTKEY(order_date);

Common Mistakes

Ignoring distribution keys. Without DISTKEY, large joins cause data reshuffling across nodes and slow queries. Always set DISTKEY on high-cardinality join columns like customer_id.
Loading one huge file. COPY performs poorly with single 100 GB files. Split data into 1-4 GB parts so each Redshift slice reads in parallel.