How to Choose PostgreSQL over BigQuery in PostgreSQL

Galaxy Glossary

Why should I use PostgreSQL instead of BigQuery?

Understand when PostgreSQL is a better fit than Google BigQuery for your workloads and how to act on that decision.

Welcome to the Galaxy, Guardian!
You'll be receiving a confirmation email

Follow us on twitter :)

Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Description

Example H2

Example H3

Why is PostgreSQL better for high-volume OLTP?

PostgreSQL excels at high-frequency inserts, row-level updates, and millisecond-level transactions. An ecommerce site must instantly record each new order and adjust Products.stock; Postgres commits these changes synchronously, while BigQuery batches them, adding latency.

How does BigQuery’s pricing compare to PostgreSQL?

BigQuery charges per scanned byte and per streamed row. Constantly reading the full Orders table for dashboards can incur surprise bills. PostgreSQL’s cost is fixed to compute and storage, so predictable workloads remain inexpensive.

What workloads still favor BigQuery?

Petabyte-scale, append-only analytics with infrequent updates fit BigQuery. Running nightly sales aggregates across years of OrderItems data leverages its columnar engine. For mixed read/write or near-real-time analytics, pair Postgres for source-of-truth with BigQuery fed by batch jobs.

How do I migrate queries from BigQuery to PostgreSQL?

Remove BigQuery-only functions (e.g., STRUCT, UNNEST) and replace with equivalent Postgres JSON or lateral joins. Verify timestamp semantics; BigQuery’s DATETIME is timezone-less, while Postgres TIMESTAMPTZ stores offsets.

Example refactor

-- BigQuery SELECT customer_id, SUM(total_amount) AS revenue FROM `project.dataset.Orders` GROUP BY customer_id; -- PostgreSQL SELECT customer_id, SUM(total_amount) AS revenue FROM Orders GROUP BY customer_id;

Best practices for a Postgres-first stack

Keep OLTP tables (Customers, Orders, Products) in Postgres. Use logical replication or Fivetran to stream changes into BigQuery for heavy analytics. Add covering indexes in Postgres to maintain sub-second API responses.

Common mistakes to avoid

Ignoring index design. Assuming Postgres will scan efficiently like BigQuery’s columnar storage leads to slow queries. Index Orders(order_date) and OrderItems(order_id).

Over-normalizing analytics tables. BigQuery handles wide denormalized tables well; Postgres may hit join bottlenecks. Aggregate data into materialized views for reporting workloads.

Why How to Choose PostgreSQL over BigQuery in PostgreSQL is important

How to Choose PostgreSQL over BigQuery in PostgreSQL Example Usage


-- Retrieve top 5 spending customers in PostgreSQL
SELECT c.id, c.name, SUM(o.total_amount) AS lifetime_value
FROM   Customers c
JOIN   Orders o ON o.customer_id = c.id
GROUP  BY c.id, c.name
ORDER  BY lifetime_value DESC
LIMIT  5;

How to Choose PostgreSQL over BigQuery in PostgreSQL Syntax


-- Connect to a local Postgres instance
psql "host=localhost dbname=ecommerce user=postgres password=secret"

-- Create index to accelerate point lookups
CREATE INDEX idx_orderitems_order_id ON OrderItems(order_id);

-- Materialized view to replicate a BigQuery aggregate pattern
CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW daily_sales AS
SELECT order_date::date   AS sales_day,
       SUM(total_amount)  AS total_revenue
FROM   Orders
GROUP  BY sales_day;

Common Mistakes

Treating PostgreSQL like a columnar warehouse. Full-table scans without selective indexes cripple performance. Add B-Tree or BRIN indexes on frequently filtered columns.
Pushing petabyte-scale historical tables into Postgres. Storage limits and vacuum overhead grow quickly. Keep hot data in Postgres and archive cold data to BigQuery or object storage.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Is PostgreSQL cheaper than BigQuery?

For steady OLTP and predictable analytics, Postgres’s fixed compute pricing is often cheaper. BigQuery becomes costly when queries scan large tables frequently.

Can I run real-time analytics in Postgres?

Yes, with proper indexing and materialized views you can maintain sub-second dashboards over recent data. For multi-terabyte history, offload to BigQuery.