How to Choose MariaDB over Snowflake in PostgreSQL

Galaxy Glossary

Why should I use MariaDB instead of Snowflake?

Learn situations where MariaDB outperforms Snowflake and how to leverage it effectively.

Welcome to the Galaxy, Guardian!
You'll be receiving a confirmation email

Follow us on twitter :)

Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Description

Example H2

Example H3

Why pick MariaDB over Snowflake?

Choose MariaDB when you need full control over the server, prefer open-source licensing, or must avoid ongoing consumption fees. MariaDB runs on-prem or in any cloud with predictable costs.

Does open-source licensing matter?

MariaDB’s GPL/LGPL license lets you inspect, modify, and self-host the engine. Snowflake is proprietary and locks you into its SaaS pricing and upgrade cycle.

Can I avoid usage-based billing?

Yes. MariaDB uses fixed-instance or container costs. Snowflake bills per compute credit and storage, which can spike with heavy queries or data growth.

Is performance comparable?

For OLTP or mixed workloads up to terabyte scale, properly indexed MariaDB tables often match Snowflake query times. Columnar storage (ENGINE=ColumnStore) further boosts analytic reads.

What about real-time writes?

MariaDB’s InnoDB handles high write rates with low latency. Snowflake stages data via COPY, adding minutes of delay.

When does Snowflake win?

Snowflake dominates petabyte-scale analytics and multi-cluster concurrency. If you need instant elasticity and zero-ops, Snowflake may justify its premium.

Best practices for adopting MariaDB

Pick the right engine (InnoDB vs ColumnStore), partition large fact tables, and enable slow-query logging. Use read replicas for heavy reporting.

Common mistakes and fixes

Ignoring analytic indexes: Add composite indexes on foreign keys (e.g., customer_id, order_date) to avoid full scans.

Over-provisioning hardware: Monitor CPU/IO and scale vertically only when wait times exceed 70%.

Quick migration checklist

Export Snowflake tables to CSV, load into MariaDB with LOAD DATA INFILE, recreate indexes, and verify row counts.

Why How to Choose MariaDB over Snowflake in PostgreSQL is important

How to Choose MariaDB over Snowflake in PostgreSQL Example Usage


-- Find top buyers last quarter in MariaDB
SELECT c.name,
       SUM(o.total_amount) AS spend
FROM   Customers c
JOIN   Orders    o ON o.customer_id = c.id
WHERE  o.order_date >= DATE_SUB(CURDATE(), INTERVAL 3 MONTH)
GROUP  BY c.id
ORDER BY spend DESC
LIMIT 10;

How to Choose MariaDB over Snowflake in PostgreSQL Syntax


-- Create an Orders table in MariaDB
CREATE TABLE Orders (
    id            BIGINT PRIMARY KEY AUTO_INCREMENT,
    customer_id   BIGINT NOT NULL,
    order_date    DATETIME NOT NULL,
    total_amount  DECIMAL(12,2) NOT NULL,
    INDEX idx_customer_date (customer_id, order_date)
) ENGINE=InnoDB;

-- Same structure in Snowflake for comparison
CREATE OR REPLACE TABLE Orders (
    id           BIGINT,
    customer_id  BIGINT,
    order_date   TIMESTAMP,
    total_amount NUMBER(12,2)
);

Common Mistakes

Overlooking ColumnStore for analytics: Many teams stick to InnoDB only, causing slow scans. Switch large fact tables to ENGINE=ColumnStore for columnar reads.
Ignoring adaptive buffer pool sizing: Leaving default 128 MB buffer pool starves reads. Set innodb_buffer_pool_size to 60-70 % of RAM.