How to Choose MariaDB over Redshift in PostgreSQL

Galaxy Glossary

Why should an engineering team use MariaDB instead of Amazon Redshift?

Explains when and why an engineering team should select MariaDB instead of Amazon Redshift for specific workloads.

Welcome to the Galaxy, Guardian!
You'll be receiving a confirmation email

Follow us on twitter :)

Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Description

Example H2

Example H3

When is MariaDB a better fit than Redshift?

Choose MariaDB when you need high-throughput OLTP, strong ACID compliance, minimal latency, and flexible deployment (self-hosted, cloud, or hybrid). Redshift excels at petabyte-scale analytics but adds cost and complexity for small, write-heavy apps.

How do workload types influence the choice?

For ecommerce order processing, MariaDB handles thousands of small writes per second and row-level locking.Redshift, optimized for columnar scans, struggles with frequent single-row mutations and requires VACUUM/ANALYZE maintenance.

What about cost and licensing?

MariaDB Server is open-source (GPL2), can run on modest hardware, and supports per-second cloud billing. Redshift is a proprietary managed service with reserved or on-demand nodes, often 3–10× pricier for identical data volumes.

How does query syntax differ?

MariaDB uses MySQL-style syntax, supports AUTO_INCREMENT, and InnoDB transactions. Redshift uses PostgreSQL 8.0 derivatives, lacks CHECK constraints, and requires COPY for bulk loads.These differences affect migration scripts and ORMs.

Can MariaDB scale?

Yes. Use primary-replica replication, Galera clustering, or Aurora-MySQL for horizontal read scaling. Combine with application sharding or ProxySQL for large ecommerce catalogs.

How do I migrate data from Redshift to MariaDB?

Export data from Redshift to S3 using UNLOAD, then load into MariaDB with LOAD DATA INFILE or the mysql client.Validate numeric precision and TIMESTAMP WITHOUT TIME ZONE conversions during import.

Best practices for running MariaDB in production?

Enable InnoDB file-per-table, set innodb_flush_log_at_trx_commit=1 for durability, and monitor with Performance Schema. Use point-in-time backups and automate failover with Orchestrator.

Key takeaway

Pick MariaDB for fast OLTP, lower cost, and open-source flexibility; keep Redshift for large-scale analytic warehouses.

Why How to Choose MariaDB over Redshift in PostgreSQL is important

How to Choose MariaDB over Redshift in PostgreSQL Example Usage


-- MariaDB: total spend per customer in the last 30 days
SELECT c.id, c.name, SUM(o.total_amount) AS spend_last_30_days
FROM Customers c
JOIN Orders o ON o.customer_id = c.id
WHERE o.order_date >= NOW() - INTERVAL 30 DAY
GROUP BY c.id, c.name
ORDER BY spend_last_30_days DESC
LIMIT 10;

How to Choose MariaDB over Redshift in PostgreSQL Syntax


-- MariaDB: create an Orders table with transactional integrity
CREATE TABLE Orders (
    id INT AUTO_INCREMENT PRIMARY KEY,
    customer_id INT NOT NULL,
    order_date DATETIME DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP,
    total_amount DECIMAL(12,2) NOT NULL,
    INDEX (customer_id),
    FOREIGN KEY (customer_id) REFERENCES Customers(id)
) ENGINE=InnoDB;

-- Redshift equivalent (note fewer constraint options)
CREATE TABLE Orders (
    id INT IDENTITY(1,1),
    customer_id INT NOT NULL,
    order_date TIMESTAMP DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP,
    total_amount DECIMAL(12,2) NOT NULL
);
-- Redshift needs DISTKEY/SORTKEY for performance
ALTER TABLE Orders ALTER DISTKEY customer_id;

Common Mistakes

Assuming Redshift can replace transactional databases. Redshift's columnar engine is optimized for analytics, not high-frequency single-row writes. Fix by keeping OLTP workloads on MariaDB or PostgreSQL.
Ignoring constraint differences. Redshift lacks full CHECK and FOREIGN KEY enforcement, leading to silent data quality issues after migration. Validate constraints or implement them at the application layer.