Features
Dimensional modeling organizes data into fact and dimension tables to make analytical queries performant and intuitive.
Dimensional modeling is a data-warehouse design technique that structures data into fact tables (quantitative business events) and dimension tables (descriptive context). Popularized by Ralph Kimball, the approach creates star- or snowflake-shaped schemas that are easy for analysts to understand and for databases to query efficiently.
OLTP databases optimize for transaction integrity; analytical workloads need something different—fast, flexible aggregation across many attributes. A dimensional model:
sales, customer, product).Contain numeric, additive measures at a specific grain (lowest level of detail). Examples: revenue, clicks, impressions.
Hold descriptive attributes—names, categories, dates—that give facts meaning. Dimensions are typically wide (many columns) but not tall.
Integer identifiers generated in the warehouse to avoid relying on source system keys, enabling slowly changing dimension (SCD) handling and multi-source integration.
You must decide how to handle attribute changes: overwrite (Type 1), version (Type 2), or add columns (Type 3). The choice affects query semantics and storage.
Start with a concrete verb-noun like “ship product” or “book ride.” Interview stakeholders to understand goals and KPIs.
Specify the exact level of detail for each row in the fact table—e.g., “one row per order line” or “one row per ad impression.” Grain clarity prevents future redesigns.
List additive or semi-additive measures captured at that grain. Validate each metric’s calculation and source field.
For every fact, list who, what, when, where, and how descriptors. Typical reusable dimensions include date, customer, product, and channel.
Determine which attributes require historical tracking and implement Type 2 (row versioning) where needed. Add effective_date and expiry_date columns and enforce surrogate keys.
Create dimension tables first so their surrogate keys can populate fact tables. Index foreign keys, cluster on date if partitioning by time.
Run prototype queries and reports to confirm numbers match legacy dashboards. Early feedback avoids expensive refactoring.
Suppose an e-commerce company wants to analyze orders. The grain is one row per order_line. Facts include order_quantity and gross_sales_amount. Dimensions are date, customer, product, and sales_channel.
Storing product_name alongside numeric metrics inflates fact size and breaks normalization. Move descriptors into dimensions.
Combining daily snapshots with transaction-level rows in the same table leads to misleading sums. Create separate fact tables per grain.
Failing to capture history hides critical changes (e.g., customer tier upgrades). Decide on SCD types during design, not as an afterthought.
While Galaxy doesn’t build the model for you, its modern SQL editor helps you explore and validate your star schema. Auto-complete surfaces fact and dimension tables, AI Copilot converts business questions into SQL, and Collections let your team endorse certified analysis against the dimensional model—eliminating ad-hoc SQL fragments in Slack or Notion.
Dimensional modeling translates complex operational data into a analytics-ready structure that scales with both data volume and user understanding. By following a disciplined process—define grain, separate facts and dimensions, handle SCDs—you build a warehouse foundation that tools like Galaxy, BI dashboards, and data-science notebooks can query effortlessly.
Operational schemas are optimized for writes, not analytics. Without a dimensional model, analysts face slow joins, duplicated logic, and misaligned metrics. A well-designed star schema standardizes business definitions, accelerates queries, and simplifies maintenance—forming the backbone of reliable dashboards, ML features, and executive reporting.
A star schema has denormalized dimensions directly connected to the fact table, minimizing joins. A snowflake further normalizes dimensions into sub-tables, saving storage but adding joins. Star schemas are preferred for performance unless disk space is a major constraint.
Base the decision on reporting needs. If historical analysis is required, implement Type 2 (row versioning). Use Type 1 only when corrections should overwrite history, and Type 3 when limited prior values suffice.
Yes. Start with the most critical business process and gradually add fact and dimension tables. Keep conformed dimensions (e.g., date, customer) reusable across future stars.
Galaxy’s SQL editor auto-completes fact and dimension tables, and its AI Copilot writes aggregation queries against your star schema. Collections let teams endorse queries so everyone calculates metrics the same way.
.avif){kind=logo}
