Data Contracts: The Blueprint for Reliable Data Exchange

Galaxy Glossary

What is a data contract and how do I write one?

A data contract is a version-controlled, testable agreement that defines the structure, meaning, and quality guarantees of data shared between producers and consumers.

Sign up for the latest in SQL knowledge from the Galaxy Team!
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Description

Data breaks are rarely caused by infrastructure—most stem from humans changing data in unexpected ways. Data contracts give engineers a language-agnostic safety net that prevents these silent schema drifts from ever reaching production dashboards.

This guide explains what a data contract is, why every modern data team should adopt them, and exactly how to write contracts that keep analytics, machine-learning models, and downstream services humming.

What Is a Data Contract?

A data contract is a formal, declarative agreement between a data producer (the service or pipeline that emits data) and a data consumer (BI tools, ML models, finance reports, etc.). Much like an API spec for microservices, a data contract describes:

  • Schema – column names, data types, nullability, primary keys
  • Semantics – business meaning and units (e.g., price_cents is USD pennies)
  • Quality rules – freshness, uniqueness, allowed ranges, referential integrity
  • Versioning & lifecycle – how changes are proposed, reviewed, and rolled out

Because contracts live in code (YAML, JSON, Protocol Buffers, Avro, etc.) and travel through CI/CD, they are testable, reviewable, and enforceable—guaranteeing that every dataset your team touches is predictable and safe.

Why Are Data Contracts Important?

1. Eliminating “Unknown Unknowns”

Without explicit guarantees, any developer can refactor a table, rename a column, or start emitting nulls. Dashboards and ML features silently break days or weeks later. Contracts surface breaking changes at pull-request time, not Monday-morning-dashboard time.

2. Scaling Data Ownership

As organizations adopt data mesh or distributed ownership, contracts let each domain own its data like a product—clearly advertising what’s guaranteed and what isn’t.

3. Automating Governance & Compliance

Regulatory frameworks (GDPR, HIPAA, SOX) demand rigorous data lineage and change management. Contracts generate machine-readable documentation that auditors love.

4. Enabling Self-Serve Analytics

Analysts trust data when it’s documented, discoverable, and stable. A contract is the single source of truth that analytics catalogs (including upcoming Galaxy roadmap features) can surface automatically.

How Data Contracts Work in Practice

Most teams implement contracts with three pillars:

  1. Specification Layer – A declarative DSL such as YAML, JSON Schema, Avro, or Protocol Buffers that defines the dataset.
  2. Validation Layer – Tests that run in CI/CD and/or at runtime (e.g., great_expectations, dbt tests, custom Spark jobs).
  3. Enforcement Layer – Gatekeepers that fail the pipeline if the contract is violated (GitHub checks, Airflow sensors, Kafka schema registry, etc.).

This triad mirrors how engineers treat source code: spec → test → CI gate.

Core Elements of a Robust Data Contract

Schema Definition

List all fields with data types, constraints, and descriptions. Optional fields should be explicit with default behaviors.

Quality Assertions

Include row-level and dataset-level expectations such as:

  • order_id must be unique
  • total_amount >= 0
  • Dataset must arrive every 5 minutes with < 15-minute latency

Metadata & Ownership

Specify the domain owner, Slack channel, escalation path, and how to request changes.

Versioning Strategy

Use semantic versioning (MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH). Breaking changes require a new MAJOR; additive, backward-compatible changes bump MINOR.

Change Management Workflow

Define pull-request templates, code owners, and CI checks that must pass before merge.

Writing a Data Contract: Step-by-Step Guide

Step 1 – Identify Producers & Consumers

List every service, pipeline, dashboard, and ML model that touches the dataset. Interview them to understand their expectations.

Step 2 – Draft the Schema

Use your preferred DSL. Example (YAML):

name: orders
version: 1.0.0
fields:
- name: order_id
type: string
description: Unique internal order identifier
- name: user_id
type: string
description: Foreign key to users table
- name: total_amount
type: decimal(12,2)
description: Total order amount in USD
constraints:
min: 0
- name: created_at
type: timestamp
description: Time the order was placed UTC

Step 3 – Add Quality Rules

Translate business logic into machine-checkable tests:

  • row_count > 0
  • freshness <= 15m
  • null_percent(user_id) = 0

Step 4 – Implement Validation

Couple the spec with a framework such as Great Expectations or dbt tests. Store tests in the same repository so they run in GitHub Actions.

Step 5 – Wire into CI/CD

Fail the build if the producer code introduces a schema that differs from the registered contract. For streaming use cases, integrate with Confluent Schema Registry or similar.

Step 6 – Publish & Monitor

Expose the contract in your data catalog. Alert the owning team when validations fail in production.

Best Practices

  • Contract First, Code Second – Just like API-first design, negotiate the contract before writing ETL logic.
  • Automate Everything – Manual enforcement doesn’t scale. Use CI checks, Git hooks, and runtime validators.
  • Keep It Declarative – Store contracts as code in the same repo as the producer service for atomic reviews.
  • Version Thoughtfully – Deprecate, don’t mutate. Retain historical versions for reproducibility.
  • Document Semantics – A contract is useless if consumers misinterpret gross vs net revenue.

Common Mistakes & How to Avoid Them

Ignoring Backward Compatibility

Silently changing a field’s data type (e.g., intstring) breaks deserializers. Follow semantic versioning and provide migration paths.

Testing Only in Production

Relying on runtime monitors alone means the first bad batch already hit downstream systems. Shift left by running contract tests in CI.

Storing Contracts in Wikis

Documentation tools can’t block code merges. Store contracts next to the producer’s codebase where they can be checked automatically.

Practical Example: Validating a Contract With Great Expectations

from great_expectations.dataset import PandasDataset
import pandas as pd

# Sample data representing an orders batch
batch = pd.DataFrame({
"order_id": ["o1", "o2"],
"user_id": ["u1", "u2"],
"total_amount": [120.50, -10.00], # Negative amount breaks contract
"created_at": ["2023-09-01T10:00:00Z", "2023-09-01T10:05:00Z"]
})

ds = PandasDataset(batch)

# Expectations derived from the YAML contract
(ds.expect_column_values_to_not_be_null("order_id")
.expect_column_values_to_be_unique("order_id")
.expect_column_values_to_not_be_null("user_id")
.expect_column_values_to_be_between("total_amount", min_value=0))

result = ds.validate()
print(result.success) # False – pipeline should fail

The failed assertion stops the ETL job before the bad data pollutes analytics tables.

Galaxy & Data Contracts

While Galaxy focuses on being a modern SQL editor, its collaboration features amplify the benefits of data contracts:

  • Discoverability – When contracts back every table, Galaxy’s metadata sidebar can surface field descriptions and constraints inline.
  • Query Refactoring – If a contract introduces a new column, Galaxy’s AI copilot can automatically update saved queries to use it—minimizing manual toil.
  • Endorsement Workflow – Teams can “Endorse” contract-verified queries in Galaxy Collections so every analyst reuses trusted SQL.

Conclusion

Data contracts bring the discipline of software engineering to the data landscape. By specifying, validating, and enforcing schemas and quality rules, contracts eliminate costly breakages and empower teams to move faster with confidence. Start small: pick one high-value dataset, write a contract, add CI tests, and watch the ripple effect of reliability spread through your stack.

Why Data Contracts: The Blueprint for Reliable Data Exchange is important

As data teams grow, schema changes, null‐filled columns, and silently broken joins can erode trust and cause downtime. A well-defined data contract acts as an API for data, catching breaking changes in CI/CD, enforcing quality gates, and giving every stakeholder—from backend engineers to analysts—a single source of truth. This elevates data from an ad-hoc by-product to a dependable product that the business can safely build critical decisions and customer-facing features on.

Data Contracts: The Blueprint for Reliable Data Exchange Example Usage


SELECT order_id,
       user_id,
       total_amount
FROM analytics.orders
WHERE contract_version = '1.0.0'
  AND created_at >= CURRENT_DATE - INTERVAL '7 days';

Common Mistakes

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

What’s the difference between a data contract and a data schema?

A schema lists fields and types; a contract adds semantics, quality rules, ownership, and versioning—essentially the operational guarantees around that schema.

Do I need special tooling to adopt data contracts?

No. You can start with plain YAML and basic SQL tests. Over time, frameworks like Great Expectations, dbt, or Kafka Schema Registry make enforcement easier.

How often should data contracts change?

Only when producer or consumer requirements change. Use semantic versioning and deprecation periods to minimize disruption.

Can Galaxy help with data contracts?

Indirectly. Galaxy’s metadata sidebar surfaces contract-backed field descriptions, and its AI copilot can refactor SQL when a contract changes, reducing manual work.

Want to learn about other SQL terms?