A data contract is a version-controlled, testable agreement that defines the structure, meaning, and quality guarantees of data shared between producers and consumers.
Data breaks are rarely caused by infrastructure—most stem from humans changing data in unexpected ways. Data contracts give engineers a language-agnostic safety net that prevents these silent schema drifts from ever reaching production dashboards.
This guide explains what a data contract is, why every modern data team should adopt them, and exactly how to write contracts that keep analytics, machine-learning models, and downstream services humming.
A data contract is a formal, declarative agreement between a data producer (the service or pipeline that emits data) and a data consumer (BI tools, ML models, finance reports, etc.). Much like an API spec for microservices, a data contract describes:
price_cents
is USD pennies)Because contracts live in code (YAML, JSON, Protocol Buffers, Avro, etc.) and travel through CI/CD, they are testable, reviewable, and enforceable—guaranteeing that every dataset your team touches is predictable and safe.
Without explicit guarantees, any developer can refactor a table, rename a column, or start emitting nulls. Dashboards and ML features silently break days or weeks later. Contracts surface breaking changes at pull-request time, not Monday-morning-dashboard time.
As organizations adopt data mesh or distributed ownership, contracts let each domain own its data like a product—clearly advertising what’s guaranteed and what isn’t.
Regulatory frameworks (GDPR, HIPAA, SOX) demand rigorous data lineage and change management. Contracts generate machine-readable documentation that auditors love.
Analysts trust data when it’s documented, discoverable, and stable. A contract is the single source of truth that analytics catalogs (including upcoming Galaxy roadmap features) can surface automatically.
Most teams implement contracts with three pillars:
great_expectations
, dbt tests
, custom Spark jobs).This triad mirrors how engineers treat source code: spec → test → CI gate.
List all fields with data types, constraints, and descriptions. Optional fields should be explicit with default behaviors.
Include row-level and dataset-level expectations such as:
order_id
must be uniquetotal_amount >= 0
Specify the domain owner, Slack channel, escalation path, and how to request changes.
Use semantic versioning (MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH
). Breaking changes require a new MAJOR
; additive, backward-compatible changes bump MINOR
.
Define pull-request templates, code owners, and CI checks that must pass before merge.
List every service, pipeline, dashboard, and ML model that touches the dataset. Interview them to understand their expectations.
Use your preferred DSL. Example (YAML):
name: orders
version: 1.0.0
fields:
- name: order_id
type: string
description: Unique internal order identifier
- name: user_id
type: string
description: Foreign key to users table
- name: total_amount
type: decimal(12,2)
description: Total order amount in USD
constraints:
min: 0
- name: created_at
type: timestamp
description: Time the order was placed UTC
Translate business logic into machine-checkable tests:
row_count > 0
freshness <= 15m
null_percent(user_id) = 0
Couple the spec with a framework such as Great Expectations or dbt tests. Store tests in the same repository so they run in GitHub Actions.
Fail the build if the producer code introduces a schema that differs from the registered contract. For streaming use cases, integrate with Confluent Schema Registry or similar.
Expose the contract in your data catalog. Alert the owning team when validations fail in production.
Silently changing a field’s data type (e.g., int
→ string
) breaks deserializers. Follow semantic versioning and provide migration paths.
Relying on runtime monitors alone means the first bad batch already hit downstream systems. Shift left by running contract tests in CI.
Documentation tools can’t block code merges. Store contracts next to the producer’s codebase where they can be checked automatically.
from great_expectations.dataset import PandasDataset
import pandas as pd
# Sample data representing an orders batch
batch = pd.DataFrame({
"order_id": ["o1", "o2"],
"user_id": ["u1", "u2"],
"total_amount": [120.50, -10.00], # Negative amount breaks contract
"created_at": ["2023-09-01T10:00:00Z", "2023-09-01T10:05:00Z"]
})
ds = PandasDataset(batch)
# Expectations derived from the YAML contract
(ds.expect_column_values_to_not_be_null("order_id")
.expect_column_values_to_be_unique("order_id")
.expect_column_values_to_not_be_null("user_id")
.expect_column_values_to_be_between("total_amount", min_value=0))
result = ds.validate()
print(result.success) # False – pipeline should fail
The failed assertion stops the ETL job before the bad data pollutes analytics tables.
While Galaxy focuses on being a modern SQL editor, its collaboration features amplify the benefits of data contracts:
Data contracts bring the discipline of software engineering to the data landscape. By specifying, validating, and enforcing schemas and quality rules, contracts eliminate costly breakages and empower teams to move faster with confidence. Start small: pick one high-value dataset, write a contract, add CI tests, and watch the ripple effect of reliability spread through your stack.
As data teams grow, schema changes, null‐filled columns, and silently broken joins can erode trust and cause downtime. A well-defined data contract acts as an API for data, catching breaking changes in CI/CD, enforcing quality gates, and giving every stakeholder—from backend engineers to analysts—a single source of truth. This elevates data from an ad-hoc by-product to a dependable product that the business can safely build critical decisions and customer-facing features on.
A schema lists fields and types; a contract adds semantics, quality rules, ownership, and versioning—essentially the operational guarantees around that schema.
No. You can start with plain YAML and basic SQL tests. Over time, frameworks like Great Expectations, dbt, or Kafka Schema Registry make enforcement easier.
Only when producer or consumer requirements change. Use semantic versioning and deprecation periods to minimize disruption.
Indirectly. Galaxy’s metadata sidebar surfaces contract-backed field descriptions, and its AI copilot can refactor SQL when a contract changes, reducing manual work.