Chart selection is the process of matching the structure, semantics, and analytic goal of a dataset to the visualization that communicates the insight most clearly.
Choosing the Right Chart for Every Data Type
Learn a repeatable framework for mapping categorical, temporal, numerical, and spatial data to the most effective visualization so that your audience grasps insights at a glance.
Chart selection is the disciplined approach of picking the visual form—bar, line, scatter, map, and so on—whose visual encodings (position, length, color, size) best match the underlying data type (categorical, ordinal, quantitative, temporal, spatial) and analytic goal (comparison, relationship, distribution, composition, or trend).
Human short-term memory can only store a handful of numbers, but it can process pre-attentive visual cues—length, slope, position—in parallel. Choosing the correct chart:
Use cases: product lines, customer segments, survey scales.
Recommended charts: bar, stacked bar, dot plot, heatmap.
Use cases: revenue, weight, latency.
Recommended charts: histogram, box plot, scatter plot, line (when ordered).
Use cases: monthly churn, daily active users.
Recommended charts: line, area, candlestick, horizon.
Use cases: store locations, geotagged events.
Recommended charts: choropleth map, point map, hexbin map.
Set2
).Pies rely on comparing angles/area, which humans estimate poorly. Replace with a bar or stacked bar when exact values matter.
Overplotting hides patterns. Instead, facet into small multiples or highlight the key series and fade the rest.
Choosing a bar chart for skewed numerical data can hide outliers. Use histograms or box plots to reveal distribution first.
Suppose you have a sales
table in Postgres and need to show monthly revenue trends.
-- Step 1: Aggregate monthly data
SELECT date_trunc('month', order_date) AS month,
SUM(total_amount) AS revenue
FROM sales
GROUP BY 1
ORDER BY 1;
Data type: month
= temporal, revenue
= quantitative.
Goal: Trend over time.
Best chart: Line chart.
If you run this query in a modern SQL editor such as Galaxy, the result grid appears instantly. From there you can pipe the result set to your favorite plotting library or BI tool. Galaxy’s upcoming visualization layer will even suggest a line chart automatically based on detected types.
Although Galaxy is primarily a lightning-fast SQL editor, chart selection still enters the picture. Galaxy’s AI Copilot inspects the schema and result set to infer data types (e.g., timestamp
, numeric
, varchar
). When you ask, “Suggest a visualization,” Copilot maps those types to recommended charts, optionally generating the Python, Vega-Lite, or Tableau spec you can paste into downstream tools.
Choosing the right chart is less art, more recipe. Clarify the question, tag data types, match the chart to the analytic goal, and respect perceptual science. Follow those steps—plus the best practices above—and your dashboards will tell compelling, error-free stories.
Picking the wrong chart leads to misinterpretation, stakeholder confusion, and poor business decisions. By aligning chart type with data type and analytic goal, you communicate insights faster and with higher accuracy, significantly improving data-driven outcomes.
First, identify whether your key variable is categorical, temporal, or quantitative. Then match it to the analytic goal—comparison, trend, distribution, relationship, or composition. This two-step mapping narrows the choice instantly.
Yes, but only when you have fewer than six categories and the goal is to provide a quick sense of part-to-whole rather than precise comparison.
Indirectly. Galaxy’s AI Copilot examines your query output, infers data types, and recommends suitable chart families or even generates starter code you can paste into a plotting library.
Aggregate into higher-level groups, filter to top n categories, or switch to a Pareto chart that combines bars with a cumulative line.