Airflow vs Dagster vs Prefect: Choosing the Right Data Orchestrator

Galaxy Glossary

What are the key differences between Airflow, Dagster, and Prefect for orchestrating data pipelines?

Airflow, Dagster, and Prefect are open-source workflow orchestration frameworks that schedule, monitor, and manage data pipelines, each with distinct design philosophies and strengths.

Sign up for the latest in SQL knowledge from the Galaxy Team!
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Description

Overview

Apache Airflow, Dagster, and Prefect sit at the heart of modern data engineering stacks. All three tools let you define, schedule, and observe complex data workflows—but they differ in API ergonomics, operational models, and ecosystem support. Understanding these differences is crucial for selecting the right orchestrator for your current and future needs.

Why Orchestration Matters

Modern data systems comprise dozens of heterogeneous tasks: extract jobs, transformation queries, model training, reverse ETL, and more. Without an orchestrator, engineers end up with brittle cron scripts, hidden dependencies, and silent failures. A robust orchestrator:

  • Provides a declarative DAG (Directed Acyclic Graph) that documents dependencies.
  • Ensures tasks run in the correct order and handles retries, backfills, and SLAs.
  • Centralizes logging, alerting, and observability so issues surface quickly.
  • Facilitates CI/CD and versioned deployments of data pipelines.

Core Design Philosophies

Apache Airflow

Airflow, created at Airbnb in 2014 and now an Apache top-level project, popularized the concept of defining DAGs as Python code. Its mature scheduler and vast provider ecosystem make it the de-facto standard in many enterprises. Airflow favors declarative task definitions and stores metadata in a relational backend that powers its rich UI.

Dagster

Dagster, released by Elementl, introduces a software-defined assets paradigm. Rather than centering on tasks, Dagster encourages developers to describe the data assets themselves—capturing lineage, metadata, and type information. Its strong typing and testing story make it feel more like a modern Python application framework.

Prefect

Prefect started as a high-level API on top of Airflow’s scheduler but evolved into its own platform with an emphasis on hybrid execution: workflows run anywhere, but orchestration happens in Prefect Cloud or an open-source server. Its motto—"the negative engineering platform"—highlights its focus on failures, retries, and state handling out of the box.

Feature-by-Feature Comparison

Authoring Experience

  • Airflow: DAGs are Python files using Operators. Requires understanding of execution context and XComs for passing data.
  • Dagster: Strongly-typed Python functions (@asset, @op) with built-in unit-testability. Asset-first design simplifies lineage.
  • Prefect: Imperative style (@flow, @task) feels natural for Python developers. Automatic parameter serialization.

Deployment

  • Airflow: Stateless schedulers & workers, but requires Postgres/MySQL metadata DB and Celery/Kubernetes/LocalExecutor. Helm charts widely adopted.
  • Dagster: dagster-daemon for scheduling; can run workers via Kubernetes Jobs, ECS tasks, or Docker. Supports multi-repo deployments.
  • Prefect: Agents poll for work, allowing execution in any environment (local process, Docker, K8s, ECS). Cloud UI is SaaS; open-source server available.

Observability

  • Airflow: Web UI shows DAG runs, Gantt charts, task logs; Prometheus exporter available.
  • Dagster: Dagit UI provides real-time logs, event timeline, asset catalog, and lineage graphs.
  • Prefect: Orion UI (2.x) displays flow run history, task state transitions, and alert rules.

Extensibility & Ecosystem

  • Airflow: 120+ providers for every major database, cloud service, and SaaS tool. Community size enormous.
  • Dagster: Growing integrations (Snowflake, dbt, BigQuery, etc.) plus native asset materializations.
  • Prefect: Collections system houses community-contributed task libraries; easy to wrap any Python code.

When to Choose Each Tool

Pick Airflow if…

  • You need a battle-tested orchestrator with a massive operator ecosystem.
  • Organizational standards or existing pipelines already rely on Airflow.
  • You prefer a declarative DAG layout and can invest in operational overhead.

Pick Dagster if…

  • You want first-class asset lineage and a type-safe development workflow.
  • You practice DataOps and value local testing of pipelines.
  • You plan to model complex dependencies across teams and domains.

Pick Prefect if…

  • You favor an imperative, Pythonic API and quick time-to-value.
  • You need hybrid execution (on-prem + cloud) with low ops overhead.
  • You require sophisticated state handling and retries without boilerplate.

Best Practices Across All Three

  1. Version your pipelines: Use Git and CI/CD to deploy DAG/flow code instead of editing in the UI.
  2. Separate concerns: Keep business logic in reusable functions; orchestration layer just coordinates.
  3. Parameterize: Accept runtime inputs via variables or parameters to avoid code duplication.
  4. Add observability: Export metrics to Prometheus/Grafana and set up alerts for failed runs.
  5. Test locally: Use Dagster’s dagster dev, Airflow’s airflow dags test, or Prefect’s prefect agent start --type=local for rapid feedback.

Common Misconceptions

"Airflow is dead."

Despite newer entrants, Airflow 2.x solved scheduler bottlenecks, and major companies continue to contribute. It remains vibrant.

"Dagster forces you to abandon tasks."

Dagster’s asset model is optional. You can still build task-centric pipelines and gradually adopt assets.

"Prefect Cloud means vendor lock-in."

Prefect provides an open-source orchestration server. You can self-host or migrate flows without code changes.

Practical Example: nightly ELT pipeline

The following snippets implement a simple ELT that extracts orders from PostgreSQL, stages them in S3, loads into Snowflake, and refreshes a dbt model. Notice how each framework expresses similar logic with different abstractions.

Airflow DAG

from airflow import DAG
from airflow.providers.postgres.hooks.postgres import PostgresHook
from airflow.providers.amazon.aws.hooks.s3 import S3Hook
from airflow.operators.python import PythonOperator
from airflow.operators.dummy import DummyOperator
from airflow.utils.dates import days_ago


def extract_orders(**context):
pg = PostgresHook(postgres_conn_id="orders_db")
rows = pg.get_records("SELECT * FROM orders WHERE created_at >= now() - interval '1 day'")
# write to S3 ...

with DAG(
dag_id="nightly_elt",
schedule_interval="0 2 * * *",
start_date=days_ago(1),
catchup=False,
) as dag:
start = DummyOperator(task_id="start")

extract = PythonOperator(task_id="extract", python_callable=extract_orders)

load = BashOperator(
task_id="load_to_snowflake",
bash_command="python load.py",
)

dbt_run = BashOperator(task_id="dbt_run", bash_command="dbt run --select orders")

start >> extract >> load >> dbt_run

Dagster Job

from dagster import job, op

@op
def extract_orders(context):
# extraction logic
return s3_key

@op
def load_to_snowflake(context, s3_key: str):
# load logic

@op
def dbt_run(context):
context.log.info("Running dbt ...")

@job
def nightly_elt():
dbt_run(load_to_snowflake(extract_orders()))

Prefect Flow

from prefect import flow, task

@task(retries=3)
def extract_orders():
# extraction logic
return s3_key

@task
def load_to_snowflake(s3_key):
# load logic

@task
def dbt_run():
print("Running dbt ...")

@flow(name="nightly-elt", log_prints=True)
def nightly_elt():
key = extract_orders()
load_to_snowflake(key)
dbt_run()

if __name__ == "__main__":
nightly_elt()

Galaxy Perspective

Although Galaxy focuses on interactive SQL editing—not orchestration—it complements these orchestrators. Engineers often prototype queries in Galaxy’s fast desktop editor, leverage its AI copilot to optimize SQL, and then embed the finalized statements into Airflow, Dagster, or Prefect tasks. By storing production-grade SQL in Galaxy Collections, teams can “endorse” validated queries and avoid pasting unvetted code into pipeline scripts, reducing errors downstream.

Final Thoughts

Choosing between Airflow, Dagster, and Prefect depends on your team’s priorities: maturity and ecosystem (Airflow), asset-centric design and type safety (Dagster), or rapid, Python-native development with strong failure semantics (Prefect). Evaluate existing skill sets, cloud architecture, and governance requirements before committing, and remember that adopting best practices—version control, testing, observability—matters more than the tool itself.

Why Airflow vs Dagster vs Prefect: Choosing the Right Data Orchestrator is important

Selecting the right orchestrator determines how reliably data products are delivered, how quickly engineers debug failures, and how easily future requirements—like lineage, hybrid execution, or complex SLAs—can be met. A poor choice leads to brittle workflows, escalating ops costs, and slower insight delivery.

Airflow vs Dagster vs Prefect: Choosing the Right Data Orchestrator Example Usage



Common Mistakes

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Is Airflow still relevant compared to newer tools?

Yes. Airflow 2.x resolved many pain points, supports a vast ecosystem, and is backed by the Apache Foundation. It remains a safe, battle-tested choice.

Can I use more than one orchestrator?

While possible, it increases cognitive load. Instead, consolidate or segment by team responsibility. If you must, standardize logging and alerting.

What migration path exists from Airflow to Dagster?

Dagster’s dagster-airflow adapter converts Airflow DAGs to Dagster jobs. You then refactor to assets incrementally.

Do I need Galaxy to work with these orchestrators?

No, but Galaxy accelerates SQL authoring. You can develop, endorse, and version SQL in Galaxy, then call it from Airflow, Dagster, or Prefect tasks for more reliable pipelines.

Want to learn about other SQL terms?