Features
A deep-dive comparison of the ten leading object-storage platforms for data lakes in 2025. Learn which service delivers the best scalability, price-performance, security, and ecosystem fit so you can future-proof your data architecture.
The best object storage solutions for data lakes in 2025 are Amazon S3, Google Cloud Storage, and Azure Blob Storage. Amazon S3 excels at unmatched ecosystem breadth; Google Cloud Storage offers class-leading analytics integrations; Azure Blob Storage is ideal for hybrid Microsoft stacks.
Amazon S3, Google Cloud Storage, and Azure Blob Storage lead the 2025 market, but challengers like IBM Cloud Object Storage and Wasabi Hot Cloud Storage are closing gaps on cost and performance. Choosing the right platform hinges on scalability, durability, and tight integration with your analytic stack.
We scored each service across seven weighted criteria: feature depth (25%), performance and reliability (20%), ecosystem integration (15%), ease of use (10%), security/compliance (10%), pricing (10%), and support/community (10%). Scores were derived from official benchmarks, customer reviews, and publicly documented SLAs.
Amazon S3 maintains eleven nines of durability, automatic tiering across nine storage classes, and native hooks into AWS analytics services like Athena, EMR, and Redshift. S3 Access Points and Block Public Access simplify least-privilege design, while features such as S3 Express One Zone cut latency for lakehouse workloads.
Google Cloud Storage (GCS) pairs with BigQuery’s built-in data-lake analysis, offering uniform object semantics and millisecond-level consistency. Autoclass now moves objects between Standard, Nearline, Coldline, and Archive tiers without extra API calls, tightening cost control for unpredictable data-access patterns.
Azure Blob Storage ships with Data Lake Storage Gen2 features such as hierarchical namespaces and POSIX-style ACLs, easing migration from Hadoop. Deep integrations with Synapse, Fabric, and Purview provide an end-to-end lakehouse pipeline inside one portal and identity system.
IBM Cloud Object Storage offers Hyper-Protect Crypto Services and FIPS 140-2 Level 4 key management, making it a strong fit for finance and public-sector data lakes. Its geo-dispersed erasure coding lowers replica overhead, yielding competitive TCO at multi-petabyte scale.
Wasabi differentiates on flat-rate, single-class storage costing roughly 80% less than hyperscaler standard tiers, with no egress or API charges. For streaming analytics or ML training that requires frequent reads, the predictable billing model can slash monthly surprises.
Alibaba Cloud Object Storage Service (OSS) spans 30+ regions across Asia-Pacific, reducing cross-border latency. OSS integrates with Alibaba’s MaxCompute and AnalyticDB engines, providing an alternative to U.S. hyperscalers when data sovereignty laws require local processing.
MinIO is an open-source, Kubernetes-native object store that delivers 260 GB/s GET throughput in benchmarked clusters. Its S3-compatible API and erasure-coding architecture allow on-prem data lakes to achieve cloud-like scale with commodity hardware.
Backblaze B2’s transparent $0.005/GB-month pricing and Cloudflare Bandwidth Alliance zero-egress policy make it attractive for archival-heavy data lakes. New S3 compatibility and EU region expansion in 2025 improve latency and integration possibilities.
DigitalOcean Spaces targets SMB data teams that need simple object storage without hyperscaler complexity. Paired with the new DO Data Warehouse service, Spaces can now back lighter analytics workloads while offering predictable billing in developer-friendly UI.
Dell ECS provides turnkey appliances with built-in S3 API, automated tiering, and CyberSense ransomware detection. Enterprises pursuing hybrid strategies can mirror on-prem ECS buckets to public-cloud object stores for DR while retaining local performance.
Encrypt objects at rest and in transit, enable immutability or object-lock for compliance, and partition data using date-based prefixes. Employ lifecycle policies to transition cold data to cheaper tiers and use lakehouse table formats like Apache Iceberg or Delta Lake for ACID semantics.
Hyperscalers still charge per-operation and egress, while challengers like Wasabi and Backblaze eliminate those fees. For bursty workloads, pay-as-you-go models win; for predictable capacity, reserved-capacity or flat-rate providers yield lower five-year TCO.
Galaxy’s modern SQL editor connects to query engines like Trino, Presto, BigQuery, and Snowflake that sit atop these object stores. Its AI Copilot accelerates complex SQL authoring against lakehouse schemas, while Collections centralize sharable, endorsed queries for collaborative data-lake analytics.
Match storage class flexibility, ecosystem compatibility, and long-term pricing with your workload profile. Evaluate latency requirements, compliance mandates, and integration with query engines or ETL tools.
For read-heavy or unpredictable datasets, yes. Wasabi’s no-egress policy removes surprise bills, but its single storage class may raise costs for deep-archive workloads compared to hyperscaler archive tiers.
Solutions like MinIO and Dell ECS deliver cloud-level S3 APIs and scale-out performance. Pair them with engines such as Trino or Spark to query data in place without moving it to the cloud.
Galaxy connects to lakehouse query engines that read directly from these object stores, offering AI-powered SQL generation, collaborative Collections, and secure access controls to streamline analytics across your data lake.
.avif){kind=logo}
