Common SQL Errors

PostgreSQL Error 42P19 invalid_recursion Explained and Fixed

August 4, 2025

PostgreSQL raises 42P19 invalid_recursion when a view, rule, or CTE references itself without a legal WITH RECURSIVE construct.

Sign up for the latest in common SQL errors from the Galaxy Team!
Welcome to the Galaxy, Guardian!
You'll be receiving a confirmation email

Follow us on twitter :)
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

What is PostgreSQL error 42P19 invalid_recursion?

PostgreSQL error 42P19 invalid_recursion appears when any view, rule, or CTE references itself, creating an unsafe dependency loop. Remove the self-reference or rewrite with WITH RECURSIVE to resolve the issue.

Error Highlights

Typical Error Message

PostgreSQL Error 42P19

Error Type

Recursion Error

Language

PostgreSQL

Symbol

invalid_recursion

Error Code

42P19

SQL State

Explanation

Table of Contents

What is PostgreSQL error 42P19 invalid_recursion?

PostgreSQL throws the 42P19 invalid_recursion error when a database object references itself directly or indirectly in a way the planner cannot safely evaluate. A classic example is a view whose SELECT statement reads from the view’s own name.

The server cancels execution to avoid infinite loops that could lock resources or crash sessions.

Correcting the object definition removes the error and lets queries run normally.

What Causes This Error?

Self-referencing views, circular view chains, rules that write to the same table they query, and common table expressions that fail to declare WITH RECURSIVE are prime triggers. Each creates a dependency loop the optimizer rejects.

How to Fix PostgreSQL invalid_recursion

Locate the object named in the error context, drop or ALTER it to remove the self-reference, or add the WITH RECURSIVE keyword where intentional recursion is required.

Validate the new definition before committing.

Common Scenarios and Solutions

Scenario: CREATE VIEW v AS SELECT * FROM v; Solution: rewrite without self-reference.

Scenario: View A depends on B and B depends on A. Solution: break the cycle by merging or refactoring one view.

Scenario: WITH t AS (SELECT * FROM t) SELECT * FROM t; Solution: add WITH RECURSIVE and a termination clause.

Best Practices to Avoid This Error

Test new views in staging, declare RECURSIVE explicitly, and document dependencies.

Continuous integration tools like Galaxy’s validator catch loops before deployment.

Related Errors and Solutions

55006 object_in_use arises from locked objects. 42P07 duplicate_table flags name collisions. 42P01 undefined_table signals missing objects. Each requires dependency checks but differs from recursion issues.

.

Common Causes

Related Errors

FAQs

Can I create recursive views in PostgreSQL?

PostgreSQL does not allow truly recursive views. Instead, place a WITH RECURSIVE query inside a normal or materialized view.

How do I find which view caused 42P19?

The server log and ERROR context show the failing object. You can also scan pg_depend for cycles.

Does Galaxy prevent invalid_recursion?

Galaxy’s client-side validator flags self-references and circular dependencies before you run the statement, greatly reducing 42P19 incidents.

Will IF NOT EXISTS fix this error?

No. IF NOT EXISTS only prevents duplicate object errors and does not address self-referencing definitions.

Start Querying with the Modern SQL Editor Today!
Welcome to the Galaxy, Guardian!
You'll be receiving a confirmation email

Follow us on twitter :)
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Check out some other errors

Trusted by top engineers on high-velocity teams
Aryeo Logo
Assort Health
Curri
Rubie Logo
Bauhealth Logo
Truvideo Logo