Common SQL Errors

PostgreSQL Error - 42P11 invalid_cursor_definition Error Explained and Fixed

August 4, 2025

Error 42P11 occurs when a DECLARE CURSOR statement mixes mutually exclusive clauses, such as WITH HOLD with FOR UPDATE/SHARE.

Sign up for the latest in common SQL errors from the Galaxy Team!
Welcome to the Galaxy, Guardian!
You'll be receiving a confirmation email

Follow us on twitter :)
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

What is the invalid_cursor_definition error?

PostgreSQL Error 42P11 (invalid_cursor_definition) appears when a cursor is declared with incompatible options – most often WITH HOLD together with FOR UPDATE/SHARE. Remove the locking clause or drop WITH HOLD to resolve the error.

Error Highlights

Typical Error Message

PostgreSQL Error 42P11

Error Type

Syntax Error

Language

PostgreSQL

Symbol

invalid_cursor_definition

Error Code

42P11

SQL State

Explanation

Table of Contents

What is the invalid_cursor_definition error in PostgreSQL?

Error 42P11 signals that a DECLARE CURSOR statement is syntactically valid but semantically inconsistent. PostgreSQL rejects the cursor because its attributes or the underlying query violate cursor rules.

The error is classified under SQLSTATE class 42 (Syntax Error or Access Rule Violation). It usually blocks execution right after the DECLARE command.

What Causes This Error?

The most common trigger is combining WITH HOLD with FOR UPDATE or FOR SHARE in the same cursor.

Holdable cursors survive COMMIT, but row-locking clauses cannot, so PostgreSQL raises 42P11.

Other causes include SCROLL restrictions, data-modifying CTEs inside the cursor query, and attempting to declare a cursor on a statement that does not return a simple result set.

How to Fix invalid_cursor_definition

Remove the conflicting clause. If the cursor must persist after COMMIT, drop FOR UPDATE/SHARE. If row locks are required, omit WITH HOLD and control the transaction manually.

For SCROLL problems, declare the cursor as NO SCROLL or remove positional fetches.

Always ensure the cursor query is a plain SELECT without data-modifying WITH queries.

Common Scenarios and Solutions

Scenario: Reporting job opens a holdable cursor for a long-running export but mistakenly appends FOR UPDATE. Solution: strip the locking clause.

Scenario: Application declares SCROLL cursor on a CTE that updates rows. Solution: convert the CTE to a subquery and run the update separately.

Best Practices to Avoid This Error

Design cursors with a single purpose: scrolling, holding, or locking – never combine.

Keep cursor queries read-only.

Use Galaxy’s SQL linting to catch mixed clauses before execution. The editor flags WITH HOLD + FOR UPDATE combos instantly.

Related Errors and Solutions

42P10 invalid_column_definition arises from illegal column defaults. 42P12 invalid_database_definition appears when CREATE DATABASE options conflict. Fix them by removing the contradictory clauses just as you would for 42P11.

.

Common Causes

Related Errors

FAQs

Can I safely use WITH HOLD and row locks together?

No. PostgreSQL forbids the mix because row locks cannot persist after COMMIT, while WITH HOLD implies survival after commit.

Does the error depend on PostgreSQL version?

The rule applies across all supported versions, though additional cursor checks were tightened in v14 and later.

How can Galaxy help me catch this error early?

Galaxy’s AI copilot parses DECLARE statements and warns about conflicting clauses before you run them, reducing trial-and-error debugging time.

Is SCROLL always safe?

Not always. SCROLL can inflate memory usage and fails on queries lacking unique ordering. Use NO SCROLL unless truly needed.

Start Querying with the Modern SQL Editor Today!
Welcome to the Galaxy, Guardian!
You'll be receiving a confirmation email

Follow us on twitter :)
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Check out some other errors

Trusted by top engineers on high-velocity teams
Aryeo Logo
Assort Health
Curri
Rubie Logo
Bauhealth Logo
Truvideo Logo