Common SQL Errors

PostgreSQL Error - 2200B escape_character_conflict Error Explained and Fixed

August 4, 2025

escape_character_conflict arises when a backslash is treated as an escape in a string literal while standard_conforming_strings is on, causing conflicting escape rules.

Sign up for the latest in common SQL errors from the Galaxy Team!
Welcome to the Galaxy, Guardian!
You'll be receiving a confirmation email

Follow us on twitter :)
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

What is escape_character_conflict error?

PostgreSQL escape_character_conflict error 2200B occurs when a backslash escape is used in a string while standard_conforming_strings is enabled. Switch to E'' escape syntax or disable standard_conforming_strings to resolve the conflict.

Error Highlights

Typical Error Message

PostgreSQL Error 2200B

Error Type

Syntax Error

Language

PostgreSQL

Symbol

escape_character_conflict

Error Code

2200B

SQL State

Explanation

Table of Contents

What is the escape_character_conflict error?

PostgreSQL raises error 2200B when it detects conflicting ways to interpret backslashes in a string literal. The server cannot decide whether the sequence is an escape or a plain character, so it aborts parsing.

The error appears at parse time, before the query executes, making it a pure syntax problem.

Fixing it requires changing the literal or session settings.

When does the error occur?

It occurs in INSERT, UPDATE, SELECT, or COPY commands that include a backslash followed by characters that could be read as an escape while standard_conforming_strings is on (the default since PostgreSQL 9.1).

Database clients that generate SQL dynamically are especially prone to this error, because they may mix legacy escape rules with modern string syntax.

Why is it important to fix?

If left unresolved, the statement never reaches execution, blocking data changes and causing application downtime.

Repeated failures flood logs and slow development pipelines.

What Causes This Error?

The primary cause is using a backslash escape (for example \n) inside a regular single-quoted string while standard_conforming_strings is set to on.

PostgreSQL treats the backslash as a literal and rejects conflicting escapes.

Another trigger is restoring dumps created on older versions that relied on backslash escapes without the E'' syntax.

How to Fix escape_character_conflict

Rewrite the literal using the E'' escape string syntax, which explicitly signals PostgreSQL to apply backslash escapes.

Alternatively, double each backslash to escape itself or disable standard_conforming_strings for the session.

For bulk maintenance, run SET standard_conforming_strings = off; before executing legacy scripts, then restore the setting to avoid future ambiguity.

Common Scenarios and Solutions

Dump/restore workflows: Use pg_dump with --quote-all-identifiers and ensure dumps rely on E'' strings. This avoids conflicts during restore.

Application ORMs: Configure the driver to emit parameterized queries instead of raw SQL with embedded literals.

Galaxy's AI copilot automatically parameterizes literals, removing escape ambiguity.

Best Practices to Avoid This Error

Always use parameter placeholders or E'' syntax for strings containing backslashes. Commit a coding standard in your repo and enforce lint checks.

Enable CI tests that run statements under standard_conforming_strings = on. Galaxy Collections let teams endorse compliant queries and share them across projects.

Related Errors and Solutions

invalid_escape_sequence (22025) appears when an unsupported escape like \x is used.

Use valid sequences or decode().

nonstandard_use_of_escape is a warning that can become an error under strict settings. Replace plain quotes with E'' strings to silence it.

.

Common Causes

Related Errors

FAQs

Does changing standard_conforming_strings affect existing data?

No. The setting only affects how future string literals are parsed, not stored values.

Is using E'' strings slower?

No measurable performance impact exists. The change is purely syntactic.

Why did my script work on PostgreSQL 8.4 but fails now?

PostgreSQL 9.1 switched the default to standard-conforming strings, exposing legacy escape usage.

Can Galaxy auto-fix this error?

Yes. Galaxy's AI copilot rewrites literals with proper E'' syntax or parameters, preventing the conflict before execution.

Start Querying with the Modern SQL Editor Today!
Welcome to the Galaxy, Guardian!
You'll be receiving a confirmation email

Follow us on twitter :)
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Check out some other errors

Trusted by top engineers on high-velocity teams
Aryeo Logo
Assort Health
Curri
Rubie Logo
Bauhealth Logo
Truvideo Logo