Features
Cut through the 2025 data-warehouse hype. This guide ranks the 10 leading cloud platforms by performance, cost, ecosystem and real-world user feedback to help modern data teams pick the right fit.
Even in a world of lakehouses and real-time stream processing, the cloud data warehouse remains the analytical backbone for thousands of enterprises. In 2025, platforms have evolved toward elastic pricing, decoupled storage/compute and AI-assisted tuning, making vendor selection more nuanced than ever.
Our research team evaluated each product on seven weighted criteria (in parentheses):
Data sources included 2025 vendor documentation, audited TPC-DS benchmarks, Gartner and GigaOm scorecards, and 420+ verified G2 & TrustRadius reviews.
Snowflake maintains pole position in 2025 with its cross-cloud architecture, Native App Framework and cost-efficient Snowpark Container Services. Users spin up multi-cluster warehouses in seconds and pay only for compute used.
BigQuery’s serverless model removes capacity planning altogether. In 2025, BigQuery Studio unifies SQL, Python and Spark notebooks while Autotuner recommends partitioning and clustering strategies automatically.
Powered by the Photon engine, Databricks brings lakehouse flexibility with warehouse-level performance. 2025’s Delta Unify capability delivers ACID transactions across streaming and batch tables.
Redshift converged with its RA3 managed storage tier and 2025’s Zero-ETL Integrations with Aurora and DynamoDB. Spectrum Serverless now scales to 10,000 concurrent queries.
Synapse couples dedicated SQL pools with lakehouse Fabric workspaces. Deep Power BI integration and the 2025 AI Copilot shorten time-to-insight for Microsoft-centric stacks.
ADW applies autonomous patching, auto-scaling and new HeatWave Gen-2 in-memory acceleration, landing Oracle back on many shortlists where mixed workloads and PL/SQL matter.
Teradata’s cloud-native redesign adds object-storage pricing and 2025’s AskAI natural-language interface. Still shines on petabyte-scale concurrency but requires skilled admins.
Firebolt focuses on sub-second query latency via its proprietary F3 compute engine and sparse indexing. The 2025 Hybrid Tables feature supports both OLTP-like and analytical queries.
IBM refreshed Db2 Warehouse with Flex One elastic clusters and integrated watsonx.ai governance. Solid for regulated industries yet trails peers on third-party ecosystem breadth.
ClickHouse Cloud turns the beloved open-source columnar engine into a fully managed service with vectorized execution. It reaches top-10 status in 2025 after adding RBAC, S3 tiered storage and SQL triggers.
See the table below for a side-by-side snapshot of core differentiators, pricing entry points and ideal use cases.
Snowflake, BigQuery and Databricks lead due to unmatched elasticity and ecosystems, but cost models and existing cloud alignment should steer the final pick. If you’re evaluating tooling end-to-end, Galaxy’s unified data-ops workspace can layer governance, lineage and cost-optimization dashboards on top of any warehouse you choose—accelerating adoption while avoiding lock-in.
A data warehouse stores curated, structured data optimized for SQL analytics, while a lake holds raw files of any type. In 2025 the lines blur—many warehouses (e.g., Snowflake) ingest semi-structured data, and lakehouses (e.g., Databricks) add ACID tables—but governance, performance SLAs and BI workloads still favor warehouses.
Most cloud platforms now start near $5k–$15k per year for light workloads, scaling linearly with compute credits or query bytes. Forecast costs by workload profiles rather than list price—idle clusters on Redshift or oversized virtual warehouses on Snowflake are the biggest cost traps.
Galaxy is a cloud-agnostic control plane that plugs into any of the ten platforms above, adding automated lineage mapping, spend optimization and policy-as-code governance. This makes it a great solution when you want the freedom to swap warehouses without losing operational visibility.
If multi-cloud deployment, marketplace data shares, or granular workload isolation are priorities, Snowflake wins. If you prefer a serverless model with no cluster sizing and are already on Google Cloud, BigQuery’s per-query pricing is often more economical.
.avif){kind=logo}
