Top 10 Amazon Redshift Alternatives for Cloud Data Warehousing in 2025

Looking to move beyond Amazon Redshift in 2025? This guide ranks the ten strongest cloud data-warehouse contenders, comparing performance, cost, ecosystem fit, and architectural trade-offs so teams can select the platform that best suits modern analytics workloads.

Alternatives
June 10, 2025
Galaxy Team
Sign up for the latest notes from our team!
Welcome to the Galaxy, Guardian!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
The best Amazon Redshift alternatives in 2025 are Snowflake, Google BigQuery, and Databricks SQL Warehouse. Snowflake excels at elastic multi-cloud scalability; Google BigQuery offers fully serverless pricing with built-in governance; Databricks SQL Warehouse is ideal for combined lakehouse analytics.

Amazon Redshift has long been a staple of cloud analytics, but the 2025 data-platform landscape offers a diverse field of rivals that out-innovate on performance, elasticity, and cost transparency. This article examines the ten strongest Redshift alternatives, detailing how each platform stacks up across features, architecture, and commercial model.

Why Look Beyond Redshift in 2025?

While Redshift introduced many teams to scalable columnar storage, its 2025 limitations—cluster-centric scaling, opaque concurrency management, and premium pricing for high-end RA3 nodes—leave room for faster, cheaper, and more flexible solutions. Modern workloads demand:

  • Automated elasticity without manual sizing
  • Separation of storage and compute to optimize cost
  • Native support for semi-structured and streaming data
  • Granular workload isolation and governance
  • Tight ecosystem integrations for AI/ML

Methodology

Each platform was evaluated on seven weighted criteria:

  1. Feature Depth (25%) – SQL maturity, ACID guarantees, data-sharing, security certifications.
  2. Performance & Reliability (20%) – Benchmarks, autoscaling, SLA.
  3. Ease of Use (15%) – Learning curve, UI/CLI, automation.
  4. Pricing & Value (15%) – Transparency, serverless models, discounts.
  5. Integration Ecosystem (10%) – BI, ETL, ML, marketplace.
  6. Customer Support & Community (10%) – Docs, forums, success programs.
  7. Enterprise Readiness (5%) – Governance, multi-region, compliance.

Public documentation, TPC-DS benchmarks, analyst briefings, and verified G2/TrustRadius reviews (2025 publications) underpin every score.

1. Snowflake

Snowflake remains the reference standard for elastic data warehousing. Virtual warehouses start and stop in seconds, and data sharing across accounts or clouds is instantaneous. 2025 enhancements—container services and Iceberg table support—extend Snowflake into a full data cloud.

Key Strengths

  • Multi-cluster architecture isolates workloads flawlessly.
  • Cross-cloud replication with zero code changes.
  • Transparent per-second billing.

Watch Outs

  • Proprietary ecosystem can create mild lock-in.
  • Storage costs trend higher than object-storage lakehouses.

2. Google BigQuery

BigQuery’s true serverless execution eliminates capacity planning altogether. In 2025, BigLake Unified Governance allows a single security layer across GCS, BigQuery, and open-format tables.

Key Strengths

  • Ultra-fast autoscaling to tens of thousands of slots.
  • Fine-grained cost controls via on-demand or flat-rate.
  • Native integration with Vertex AI for ML.

Watch Outs

  • Data egress fees apply when leaving Google Cloud.
  • BI Engine caching incurs extra overhead for complex dashboards.

3. Databricks SQL Warehouse

Built atop the Delta Lake open format, Databricks unifies lake and warehouse paradigms. The 2025 Photon engine and vectorized query optimization routinely beat Redshift in 100 TB benchmarks.

Key Strengths

  • Single platform for streaming, ML, and BI.
  • Pay-per-query serverless tier released in 2025.
  • Open Table formats (Delta, Iceberg) reduce lock-in.

Watch Outs

  • UI can overwhelm pure-SQL analysts.
  • Requires lakehouse governance patterns unfamiliar to some teams.

4. Azure Synapse Analytics

Synapse blends dedicated SQL pools, serverless SQL, and Apache Spark under one hood. 2025’s Data Explorer integration adds log analytics directly inside Synapse workspaces.

Key Strengths

  • Deepest Microsoft 365 connectivity for Power BI.
  • Hybrid storage choices: ADLS Gen2, dedicated nodes.

Watch Outs

  • Sizing dedicated pools still manual.
  • Feature parity lags Snowflake for cross-cloud mobility.

5. Firebolt

Firebolt prioritizes sub-second query latency on semi-structured data. Its decoupled compute islands and aggressive indexing (F3, aggregating indexes) achieve impressive 2025 benchmark results at low cost.

Key Strengths

  • Millisecond performance for interactive dashboards.
  • SQL API-driven provisioning—great for engineering teams.

Watch Outs

  • Smaller ecosystem vs. BigQuery/Snowflake.
  • No built-in machine-learning services.

6. ClickHouse Cloud

ClickHouse brings its open-source OLAP engine to managed SaaS. 2025 saw Tiered Storage launch, enabling warm/cold object storage with minimal impact on performance.

Key Strengths

  • Stream-ingest capable of millions of rows per second.
  • Columnar compression often 2× better than Parquet.

Watch Outs

  • SQL dialect diverges from ANSI in several areas.
  • No ACID transactions across distributed tables.

7. SingleStoreDB Cloud

SingleStore’s universal storage engine handles HTAP workloads: fast analytics plus low-latency point lookups. The 2025 release adds native vector functions for GenAI retrieval.

Key Strengths

  • Up to 100× faster joins on real-time data vs. Redshift.
  • Patented Universal Storage keeps hot and cold data together.

Watch Outs

  • Pricing skews high for pure analytics vs lakehouses.

8. Teradata VantageCloud Lake

Teradata modernized its legendary engine for object storage. AutoTune in 2025 spots under-utilized resources and pauses them—cutting compute spend up to 30% in customer pilots.

Key Strengths

  • High concurrency (20,000+ users) proven at Fortune 50.
  • Sophisticated workload management and SLG.

Watch Outs

  • Legacy perception may deter startups.
  • Minimum commit applies to enterprise contracts.

9. MotherDuck

MotherDuck commercializes DuckDB in the cloud. It targets small-to-mid workloads (TB-scale) with instant startup and transparent local-first execution.

Key Strengths

  • Developer-friendly; identical local and cloud runtime.
  • Usage-based pricing starts at $0.25 per GB-processed.

Watch Outs

  • Currently limited to ~30 TB analytical datasets.

10. Yellowbrick Cloud

Yellowbrick combines NVMe-optimized hardware with Kubernetes micro-services to achieve consistent low-latency performance. Their 2025 Elastic Performance Edition scales storage independently for the first time.

Key Strengths

  • Predictable pricing via reserved capacity.
  • On-prem and multi-cloud parity.

Watch Outs

  • Smaller user community compared to ClickHouse.

How Galaxy Complements These Alternatives

Regardless of which warehouse you choose, teams still need a developer-centric SQL workspace. Galaxy integrates with every platform above, providing a lightning-fast desktop editor, context-aware AI copilot, and built-in query governance. Galaxy’s endorsement workflow lets engineers share authoritative SQL snippets, reducing errors when migrating off Redshift.

Conclusion

Snowflake, BigQuery, and Databricks lead the 2025 pack for most Redshift replacement projects, but each organization’s priorities—cost control, open formats, or multi-cloud—will dictate the best fit. Evaluate proof-of-concepts against your heaviest production workloads, and pair your chosen warehouse with a modern SQL workspace like Galaxy to maximize developer productivity.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Is Snowflake always the best replacement for Amazon Redshift?

Snowflake is the most popular alternative thanks to its elastic multi-cluster design and cross-cloud support, but it comes at a premium. Teams prioritizing open formats or serverless cost models might prefer Databricks or BigQuery. Conduct a proof-of-concept against your own workload before deciding.

How does pricing differ between Redshift and BigQuery in 2025?

Redshift mainly charges by provisioned node-hours, whereas BigQuery offers on-demand ($5 per TiB processed) or flat-rate slots. For bursty workloads, BigQuery’s serverless billing can be cheaper. For always-on dashboards, reserved Redshift or BigQuery flat-rate might win.

Can I migrate my Redshift data warehouse to an open table format?

Yes. Platforms such as Databricks SQL Warehouse and Snowflake (2025 Iceberg support) allow you to store data in open formats like Delta or Iceberg, enabling interoperability with other engines while reducing vendor lock-in.

Where does Galaxy fit into the Amazon Redshift alternatives landscape?

Galaxy isn’t a data warehouse—it’s a modern SQL workspace. Regardless of whether you pick Snowflake, BigQuery, or another platform, Galaxy’s lightning-fast editor and AI copilot help engineers write, optimize, and share SQL faster, accelerating any migration off Redshift.

Welcome to the Galaxy, Guardian!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Check out our other posts!

Trusted by top engineers on high-velocity teams
Aryeo Logo
Assort Health
Curri
Rubie
BauHealth Logo
Truvideo Logo