Exports data from PostgreSQL and imports it into Google BigQuery with minimal downtime.
BigQuery offers elastic scaling, lower maintenance, and strong analytical performance.Migrating key tables keeps transactional data in Postgres while enabling fast reporting in BigQuery.
1) Export Postgres tables to CSV or Avro.
2) Stage files in Google Cloud Storage (GCS).
3) Create matching BigQuery schemas.
4) Load data with bq load
jobs.
5) Validate row counts and spot-check queries.
6) Automate daily or near-real-time syncs.
Use pg_dump --data-only --format=custom
for Avro/Parquet or \copy
for CSV.Ensure NULL
handling and disable triggers to speed the dump.
\copy Customers TO 'customers.csv' CSV HEADER
Install the gsutil
CLI, then run gsutil cp customers.csv gs://ecom-bucket/
. Set lifecycle rules to auto-delete temp files.
Create datasets and tables that mirror Postgres types.Prefer NUMERIC
for money columns and DATETIME
for timestamp without time zone
.
bq mk --table ecom_ds.Customers id:INT64,name:STRING,email:STRING,created_at:DATETIME
Run bq load
with source format and schema autodetect off for safety. Use the --replace=false
flag to append.
bq load --source_format=CSV --skip_leading_rows=1 ecom_ds.Customers gs://ecom-bucket/customers.csv
Compare counts: SELECT COUNT(*) FROM Customers
in both systems. For spot checks, hash sample rows in Postgres and BigQuery, then compare.
Automate exports with cron or Airflow.For near-real-time, use wal2json
logical replication into Pub/Sub and BigQuery streaming inserts.
• Export in parallel per table.
• Compress files (GZIP) to cut costs.
• Use partitioned tables in BigQuery.
• Monitor slot usage and job history.
Migrate ETL and BI dashboards only after two days of consistent syncs and validated data to minimize user disruption.
.
The safest method is table-by-table exports so you can validate each load. For full dumps, export to Avro or Parquet and load with wildcard URIs.
Set up logical replication with wal2json
streaming into Pub/Sub and a Dataflow job that writes to BigQuery.
No. Enforce relationships in ETL or with lookups during query time. Model dimensions and facts instead of relational constraints.