Choosing Snowflake over BigQuery offers flexible pricing, cross-cloud support, and zero-copy data sharing.
Snowflake decouples storage and compute on any major cloud, enabling cross-region collaboration without vendor lock-in. Pay-per-second warehouses let you pause compute, lowering idle spend. Native data-sharing eliminates ETL overhead when exposing data to partners.
BigQuery9s on-demand plan bills per scanned terabyte, creating cost surprises with large joins. Snowflake bills for actual CPU seconds used by a virtual warehouse, so predictable batch workloads cost less.Auto-suspend avoids charges while queries are idle.
Time Travel keeps historical table versions for up to 90 days, simplifying rollbacks. Zero-copy Cloning spins up dev environments instantly without duplicating data. JavaScript UDFs and Snowpark allow version-controlled, language-based logic.
Both engines support JSON, but Snowflake9s VARIANT column and FLATTEN function avoid defining explicit schemas.Developers can combine structured Orders rows with raw product events in a single SQL statement.
BigQuery excels for ad-hoc petabyte scans with flat-rate pricing, tight GCP integration, and built-in BI Engine caching. Teams fully invested in GCP may value lower operational work.
Snowflake9s multi-cluster warehouses handle hundreds of concurrent dashboard queries, while BigQuery queues if slots are exhausted.For SaaS apps with unpredictable spikes, Snowflake delivers lower latency.
See below.
.
It depends on workload. Long, predictable jobs are often cheaper in Snowflake thanks to auto-suspend. Unpredictable petabyte scans can be cheaper in BigQuery9s flat-rate plan.
Yes. Use Snowflake External Tables with a GCS stage. This lets you incrementally migrate while keeping a single query layer.
Most standard SQL transfers directly. Adjust date functions (e.g., DATE_ADD vs DATEADD) and replace BigQuery STRUCTs with Snowflake OBJECT or VARIANT.