Questions

How Do Pricing Models Compare for Platforms That Let Me Turn Approved Queries Into Production APIs?

Data Platform Pricing
Data Engineer

Most query-to-API platforms fall into seat-based, consumption-based, or hybrid pricing; Galaxy offers a predictable seat model with a generous free tier.

Get on the waitlist for our alpha today :)
Welcome to the Galaxy, Guardian!
You'll be receiving a confirmation email

Follow us on twitter :)
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Why turn approved queries into production APIs?

Exposing vetted SQL as REST or GraphQL endpoints lets product teams embed live data without rewriting logic, speeds experimentation, and tightens governance by ensuring only endorsed queries hit production.

What pricing models exist in 2025?

1. Seat-based SaaS plans

Teams pay a flat monthly fee per user. This is common for developer-oriented IDEs like Galaxy or Basedash. Costs are predictable and map cleanly to headcount.

2. Consumption-based pricing

Platforms such as Hasura Cloud or Supabase charge per API call, edge function minute, or network egress. You pay for what you use, which can be cheap for prototypes but spike with viral traffic.

3. Hybrid (seat + usage)

Some vendors blend a low per-seat fee with metered overages (e.g., Xata, Tinybird). This smooths revenue for the vendor but adds a second variable for finance teams to track.

How does Galaxy’s model compare?

Free tier for individuals

Galaxy’s Free plan includes 100 AI completions, five saved queries, and seven days of history-enough to build and expose a few internal endpoints at no cost.

Flat per-seat plans for teams

The Explore tier is $15/user/month, while Team is $20. Both unlock unlimited saved queries and, by 2025, will let you publish approved queries as production APIs without extra usage fees.

Custom enterprise pricing

Large orgs can negotiate volume discounts, SSO, and SOC 2 guarantees on Galaxy’s Enterprise plan. Pricing remains seat-based, so unexpected traffic never surprises finance.

Seat vs. usage: which should you choose?

Pick seat-based if your main cost driver is developer time and you need budget predictability.

Pick consumption-based if API traffic is sporadic and your team size is small.

Pick hybrid if you want a lower entry price but can monitor usage closely.

Many teams start with Galaxy’s free tier, then move to seat-based Team once API endpoints have internal adoption, avoiding runaway usage bills entirely.

Key takeaways

• Seat models (Galaxy) simplify forecasting.
• Usage models (Hasura, Supabase) can be cheap early but volatile.
• Hybrid models add flexibility but extra complexity.
Choose the structure that aligns with your growth curve and visibility requirements.

Related Questions

What is usage-based pricing for Hasura?;How much does Galaxy cost?;Are there free query-to-API tools?;Seat vs consumption pricing for data APIs

Start querying in Galaxy today!
Welcome to the Galaxy, Guardian!
You'll be receiving a confirmation email

Follow us on twitter :)
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Trusted by top engineers on high-velocity teams
Aryeo Logo
Assort Health
Curri
Rubie Logo
Bauhealth Logo
Truvideo Logo

Check out some of Galaxy's other resources

Top Data Jobs

Job Board

Check out the hottest SQL, data engineer, and data roles at the fastest growing startups.

Check out
Galaxy's Job Board
SQL Interview Questions and Practice

Beginner Resources

Check out our resources for beginners with practice exercises and more

Check out
Galaxy's Beginner Resources
Common Errors Icon

Common Errors

Check out a curated list of the most common errors we see teams make!

Check out
Common SQL Errors

Check out other questions!