Artificial intelligence isn’t just about chatbots anymore. AI agents are redefining how we solve complex business challenges, blending language, reasoning, and real-world action.

TL;DR

• AI agents are autonomous systems that break down and execute tasks on your behalf

• They combine language models, memory, and tool use to go beyond simple Q&A or rules-based bots

• Agentic AI adapts, learns, and reasons about goals—enabling stepwise progress, not just surface-level replies

• Understanding the difference between agentic and nonagentic chatbots is key to future-proofing your AI stack

• Risks include complexity, feedback loops, and data governance—but best practices can manage them

---

When you hear "AI agent," think of a system that works for you by orchestrating tasks—often across different tools or domains—without human micromanagement. AI agents aren’t just “better chatbots.” They’re built to:

What Is an AI Agent?

• Sense the environment (perception)

• Plan steps toward a goal (reasoning and planning)

• Act using available tools and external data

• Store, update, and reflect on outcomes (memory and learning)

In the enterprise, this means moving from simple automation to intelligent workflows: software design, IT automation, code generation, even goal-oriented assistants that continually improve the experience.

How Do AI Agents Work?

• Autonomy: pursues multi-step goals, not just one-shot answers

• Tool use: calls APIs, runs searches, interacts with databases or other systems—all independently

The foundation is almost always a large language model (LLM). But what sets an AI agent apart is how it augments that language capability with:

• Memory: keeps track of previous actions, outcomes, user preferences

• Iteration: decomposes complex tasks, learns from feedback (human or machine), and adapts over time

Three Pillars of Agentic AI

1. Goal Initialization and Planning

• Goals come from humans, but how to reach them is up to the agent

• The system breaks down big objectives into smaller steps or subtasks

• Developers, deployment teams, and end users each influence the agent’s scope and rules

2. Reasoning with Available Tools

• Agents don’t just generate answers—they fill in gaps by calling tools, searching for data, or consulting external systems (including other agents)

• They continually reassess and adapt their approach as new information arrives

3. Learning and Reflection

• Collaboration is baked in: one agent may consult another for specialized knowledge, then synthesize the results

• Iterative refinement, not static scripting, drives improvement

• Agents learn from both human feedback and multi-agent feedback, storing “lessons learned” for future use

• This is the move from fixed responses to continuous adaptation

Agentic vs. Nonagentic Chatbots

Not every conversational AI is an agent. Here’s the key difference:

Agentic systems move beyond surface answers. They adapt, personalize, and reason—the core of the next generation of intelligent automation.

Reasoning Paradigms: ReAct and ReWOO

There isn’t a single “AI agent architecture.” Two common reasoning styles are:

ReAct (Reasoning and Action)

• Agents “think aloud” after actions, making each step explicit

• Useful for problems that require stepwise, explainable problem-solving

ReWOO (Reasoning Without Observation)

• Enables continuous context updates and introspection

• Agents plan all actions upfront, then execute the plan

• Reduces redundant tool calls and allows users to review steps before execution

• Good for high-stakes domains where oversight is vital

Types of AI Agents (From Simple to Advanced)

• Simple Reflex Agents: Rule-based, no memory. Good for static, predictable tasks.

• Model-Based Reflex Agents: Keep a model of the world, enabling limited adaptation.

• Goal-Based Agents: Plan action sequences to reach a goal. Think navigation apps.

• Utility-Based Agents: Optimize for best-case scenarios using multiple variables (e.g., speed, cost).

• Learning Agents: Improve via experience, storing knowledge and feedback.

Common Use Cases for AI Agents

• Customer experience: Virtual assistants, interview simulators, mental health bots

• Healthcare: Patient treatment planning, drug management, admin triage

• Emergency response: Social media monitoring, location-based rescue

• Finance and supply chain: Market prediction, supply optimization, personal recommendations

Benefits

• Task Automation: Free up humans by automating convoluted, multi-step workflows

• Performance: Multi-agent orchestration often outperforms solo bots by synthesizing specialist knowledge

• Quality of Responses: Personalized, context-driven, and more accurate than generic chatbots

• Multi-Agent Dependencies: Shared blind spots in foundation models may trigger cascading failures

• Feedback Loops: Without guardrails, agents can get stuck in tool-calling loops

Risks and Limitations

• Computational Complexity: High upfront costs to design and train

• Data Privacy: Integrating agents into core business processes requires strong governance

Best Practices

• Activity Logs: Keep detailed, auditable records of agent’s actions for review and trust

• Interruptibility: Allow humans to halt or override long-running or errant agent behaviors

• Unique Identifiers: Use traceable IDs for accountability and backtracking

• Human Supervision: Especially early on, human-in-the-loop feedback accelerates learning and reduces risk

Frequently Asked Questions

What’s the difference between an AI agent and a chatbot?

Chatbots respond to one-off queries using fixed rules or scripts. True AI agents pursue goals, plan tasks, use memory, and adapt using real-world tools.

Do AI agents replace humans?

No. They automate “busywork”—but still require humans to set goals, define boundaries, and provide feedback, especially in dynamic contexts.

How do agents interact with existing systems?

Via APIs, tool calls, and sometimes even other agents. This ability to bridge silos is why agents are the backbone of interoperable, AI-ready organizations.

Are AI agents risky?

Yes, if deployed without governance. Feedback loops, bias, privacy vulnerabilities are real—mitigate with activity logs and human oversight.

What’s the connection to knowledge graphs and ontologies?

Takeaway

Great question. For AI agents to reason, plan, and collaborate, they need shared meaning across data and domains. Ontology is critical—it provides the context layer for true interoperability. That’s the foundation Galaxy is building: unifying fragmented enterprise data so agents (and AI) can actually understand, not just process, your organization.

AI agents represent a leap forward. They move organizations from automated “translation” to shared, semantic understanding. As the market matures, the winners will be those who connect data with meaning—and design agents that don’t just act, but reason. Want to be ready for the next wave? Start thinking about your ontology and interoperability strategy now.